公司决议签名被仿冒的法律对策——兼议公司瑕疵决议的效力评价体系

Legal Countermeasure on Fake Signature of Company＇ s Resolution -on the Evaluation System of the Effectiveness of the Defective Resolution of the Company

我国《公司法》就公司决议瑕疵采用“二分法”的处理方式：以“决议无效”评价决议内容违法情形，以“决议可撤销”应对程序瑕疵及内容违反章程。在这一框架中，公司决议上表决人签名被仿冒的情形难以获得适当的法律评价与处置，司法实践中法院的裁判思路也难以统一。从决议的法律性质来看，决议签名被仿冒的情形应被定性为“严重程序瑕疵”．由于该瑕疵违背了决议的正当程序要求进而损害了决议的正当性，故该瑕疵决议不能获得法律肯定，只能以“决议无效”为其评价后果。我国现行的“瑕疵决议效力评价体系”就决议瑕疵类型与法律评价后果之间的对应关系匹配不当，应将程序性瑕疵划分为一般性程序瑕疵与严重程序瑕疵，分别对应“决议可撤销”与“决议无效”的评价后果，在保留现在立法框架的前提下设置更为合理的法律效力应对关系。

Company Law of the People＇s Republic of China provide the ＂dichotomy＂ approach for the company resolution flaws ：＂invalid approach＂ for the illegal content; ＂resolution can be revoked ＂to deal with the procedural flaws or the contents in which a violation of regulations included. In this framework, the defective resolution whose signature was fake is difficult to obtain the appropriate legal evaluation or disposal of the case. From the legal nature of the resolution, the signature on the resolution is recognized as a fake one should be characterized as ＂serious procedural flaws＂ can only be ＂invalid＂ for its evaluation results, because the defect of the resolution will damage the due process and the legitimacy of the resolution. In our country, the current ＂defect resolution effect evaluation system＂ should be changed. The procedural flaws can be devided into normal flaws and serious flaws , the serious one should be identified invalid.