期刊文献+

不接触技术对冠状动脉旁路移植术后静脉桥通畅率影响的进展 被引量:9

Progress of Effect of No-touch Technique on Patency Rate of Vein Grafts after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
原文传递
导出
摘要 冠状动脉旁路移植术(coronary artery bypass grafting,CABG)是目前治疗冠心病的有效方法,但冠状动脉旁路移植术后有比较高的静脉桥闭塞率,严重影响CABG术后的近、远期临床治疗效果。静脉获取技术被认为是影响远期通畅率的一个重要因素。与开放性大隐静脉获取技术相比,不接触技术获取大隐静脉时保留了血管外膜以及血管周围组织,同时避免高压扩张静脉。使用不接触技术获取的静脉进行冠状动脉旁路移植术后,静脉桥取得了较好的近、远期通畅率,但效果还需要进一步的临床证实。 Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an effective method for the treatment of coronary heart disease at present. However, there is still a high rate of vein graft occlusion after CABG, which has a serious impact on the short and long-term clinical results. Venous access technique has been considered as an important factor on affecting the long-term patency rate. Compared with harvesting technology of the open saphenous vein harvesting, no-touch technology retained the surrounding tissue and vascular adventitia of great saphenous vein, and it avoided the high pressure of expansion vein. After CABG was performed by using the no-touch technique, the vein grafts obtained a better short and long-term patency rate, but the effect still needs further clinical verification.
出处 《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 2016年第8期827-831,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
基金 协和青年科研基金资助(2013-XHQN01) 北京市自然科学基金资助(7162161)~~
关键词 不接触技术 冠状动脉旁路移植术 静脉桥 通畅率 No-touch technique Coronary artery bypass grafting Vein graft Patency rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(25): 2375-2384.
  • 2Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet, 2013, 381(9867): 629-638.
  • 3胡盛寿,郑哲,周玉燕.常规与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗冠状动脉多支病变的对比分析[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2000,7(4):221-224. 被引量:34
  • 4Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996, 28(3): 616-626.
  • 5Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44(11): 2149-2156.
  • 6Manninen HI, Jaakkola P, Suhonen M, et al. Angiographic predictors of graft patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial and venous grafts. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998, 66(4): 1289-1294.
  • 7Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a department of veterans affairs cooperative study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44(11): 2149-2156.
  • 8Parang P, Arora R. Coronary vein graft disease: pathogenesis and prevention. Can J Cardiol, 2009, 25(2): e57-e62.
  • 9Verma S, Lovren F, Pan Y, et al. Pedicled no-touch saphenous vein graft harvest limits vascular smooth muscle cell activation: the PATENT saphenous vein graft study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 45(4): 717-725.
  • 10Samano N, Geijer H, Liden M, et al. The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015, 150(4): 880-888.

二级参考文献13

  • 111,Kappert U, Gulielmos V, Knaut M, et al. The application of the Octopus stabilizingsystem for the treatment of high risk patients with coronary artery disease. Eur JCardiothorac Surg, 1999, 16(Suppl 2):7-9.
  • 213,Soltoski P, Salerno T, Levinsky L, et al. Conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass inoff-pump coronary artery bypass grafting:its effect on outcome. J Card Surg, 1998,13(5):328-334.
  • 314,Diegeler A, Matin M, Falk V, et al. Coronary bypass grafting without cardiopulmonarybypass-technical considerations, clinical results, and follow-up. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,1999, 47(1):14-18.
  • 4 2,Benetti FJ, Naselli G, Wood M, et al. Direct myocardial revascularization withoutextracorporeal circulation:Experience in 700 patients. Chest, 1991, 100(2):312-316. 3,Buffolo E, de Andrade CS, Branco JN, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting withoutcardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg, 1996, 61(1):63-66.
  • 5 4,Bouchard D, Cartier R. Off-pump revascularization of multivessel coronary arterydisease has a decreased myocardial infarction rate. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1998,14(Suppl 1):20-24.
  • 6 5,Kshettry VR, Flavin TF, Emery RW, et al. Does multivessel,off-pump coronary arterybypass reduce postoperative morbidity?Ann Thorac Surg,2000, 69(6):1725-1730.
  • 7 6,Lee JD, Dang CR, Taoka S, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting performed with orwithout a bypass pump:early results. Hawaii Med J, 2000, 59(2):54-56.
  • 8 7,Arom KV, Emery RW, Flavin TF, et al. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasivecoronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 1999,68(4):1562-1566.
  • 9 8,Boyd WD, Desai ND, Del Rizzo DF, et al. Off-pump surgery decreases postoperativecomplications and resource utilization in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg, 1999,68(4):1490-1493.
  • 10 9,Reichenspurner H, Boehm D, Detter C, et al. Economic evaluation of differentminimally invasive procedures for the treatment of coronary artery disease. Eur JCardiothorac Surg, 1999, 16(Suppl 2):76-79.

共引文献33

同被引文献19

引证文献9

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部