Leadership, Control Mechanisms and Networks for Sustainable Fishing
Leadership, Control Mechanisms and Networks for Sustainable Fishing
摘要
The purpose of this article was to analyse how fisheries governance can be improved when there is low enforcement capacity by state's institutions. Based on the theoretical arguments from the neo-institutionalism and the social capital approaches, the findings of this research point to the role of fishing cooperatives' structural organization on the attitude of individuals to comply with regulations. Using a most similar comparative method, it was found that fishers with higher scores of compliance belong to cooperatives that have an outstanding leader, control mechanisms, as well as multi-actor external networks which connect the organization with other networks and thus facilitate the access to knowledge, technology and activities related to conservation and sustainable fishing. The findings of the research coincide with other studies about the importance of leadership that enable good fishing management. This may help in the design of different strategies to address situations with low state capacity to ensure compliance and contribute to solve problems of commons, such as the one in marine fisheries.
参考文献10
-
1Mexican Institute for Competitiveness (IMCO). 2013. Illegality of Fisheries in Mexico: A Barrier to Competitiveness. (in Spanish).
-
2National Commission of Aquaculture and Fishing (CONAPESCA). 2013. Open Data of CONAPESCA. (in Spanish).
-
3Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organizations. New York: Free Press.
-
4Ostrom, E., and Ahn, T. K. 2003. "A Social Science Perspective on Social Capital: Social Capital and Collective Action." Mexican Magazine of Sociology January-March, No. 1: 155-233. (in Spanish).
-
5Coleman, J. S. 1988. "Social Capital and Human Capital Building." Zona Abierta Magazine 2001, No. 94/95. (inSpanish).
-
6Burt, R. S. "Structural Holes Versus Network Closure as Social Capital." In Social Capital: Theory and Research, edited by Lin, N., Cook, N., and Burr, R. S. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 31-56.
-
7Borja, R. 1997. Encyclopedia of Politics. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica. (in Spanish).
-
8Ostrom, E. 2011. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of lnstitutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
-
9Guti~rrez, N. L., Hilbom, R., and Defeo, O. 2011. "Leadership, Social Capital and Incentives to Promote Succesful Fisheries." Nature 470: 386-9.
-
10McCay, B. J., Micheli, F., Ponce-Diaz, G., Murray, G., Shester, G., Ramirez-Sanchez, S., and Weisman, W. 2013. "Cooperatives, Concessions and Co-management on the Pacific Coast of Mexico." Marine Policy 44: 49-59.
-
1Economy[J].China Today,2013,62(3):16-17.
-
2决策者说[J].今日浙江,2008(20):4-4.
-
3习近平的网络强国梦[J].网络传播,2015,0(8):10-11.
-
4张鹏.万物互联如何推动企业创造价值?[J].通信世界,2013(20):27-27. 被引量:2
-
5和正兴.坚持科学发展 提高执纪能力[J].中国监察,2008(18):50-51.
-
6周全,仇建军.提高基层环境监察执法能力的措施[J].化工管理,2017(10):118-118. 被引量:1
-
7“非洲国家渔业管理官员研修班”在江苏无锡成功举办[J].科学养鱼,2006,28(12).
-
8王守民,韩明轩,曲修杰,孔芳,彭远松.加强黄河流域渔业管理 促进流域渔业经济持续发展——黄河流域渔业管理工作调研报告(二)[J].渔政,2008(1):5-8.
-
9苏杭.日本对外直接投资的网络化发展及启示[J].日本学刊,2015(2):93-108. 被引量:8
-
10高太平,刘靖.黑龙江省国有林区非公有制林业发展研究[J].林业勘查设计,2012(3):17-19. 被引量:1