期刊文献+

舞台叙事的多模态语篇研究——基于对一次英语朗诵比赛的舞台语言使用分析 被引量:8

A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Stage Narratives: Evidence from the Use of Stage Language in an English Recitation Contest
原文传递
导出
摘要 舞台叙事涉及多种语言和非语言叙事模态的调用和协同,属于多模态语篇分析范畴,但舞台叙事在教学实践和理论研究方面的价值还有待发掘。在系统功能语言学的多模态语篇分析理论框架下,本文通过分析一次英语朗诵比赛的舞台语言使用情况,旨在探讨舞台叙事的模态界定依据和叙事功能,以及叙事模态之间的关系对舞台叙事语篇意义构建的影响。结果发现,舞台上有七种常见叙事模态,主次有序,存在互补式和非互补式两种协同关系。了解舞台叙事模态的功能和它们之间的协同关系有助于指导学生更有效地利用舞台锻炼外语综合应用能力,也有利于发展他们的多元读写能力。 Stage narratives,w hich involve the synergy of many verbal and non-verbal narrative modes,fall w ithin the field of multimodal discourse analysis. How ever,their use in English teaching and theoretical research has been under-investigated. Within the framew ork of systemic-functional approach to multimodal discourse analysis( SF-M DA),this study analyzes the use of stage language in an English recitation contest,aiming to explore how narrative modes are identified and how they function in stage narratives,as w ell as how intermodal relationships influence the meaning making of stage narratives. Results indicated that there w ere seven narrative modes commonly used on stage,organized as primary and secondary ones. They synergized w ith one another in complementary or non-complementary relationships. Understanding how narrative modes function and synergize on stage can inform students of the use of stage language more effectively so as to improve their comprehensive language proficiency,as w ell as enhance their competence in multiliteracies.
作者 陈松菁
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期70-78,149,共9页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目"外语课堂多模态因素对交际意愿的影响研究(项目编号:13YJA740041)"的部分成果
关键词 舞台叙事 多模态语篇分析 模态关系 多元读写能力 stage narratives multimodal discourse analysis intermodal relationship multiliteracies
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Baldry, A. & P. Thibault. 2006. Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis : A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook[M ]. London/OakviUe: Equinox.
  • 2Chandler, P. 2014. Enabling students to be effective multimodal authors [ A ]. In L. Unsworth & A. Thomas ( eds. ). English Teaching & New Literacies Pedagogy [ C ]. New York: Peter Lang.
  • 3Halliday, M. & R. Hasan. 1985. Language, Context and Text :Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective [ M]. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
  • 4Halliday, M. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar[ M ]. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 5Kress, G. & T. van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images : The Grammar of Visual Design ( 2 nd Edition) [ M ]. New York: Psychology Press.
  • 6Kress,G. 2009. What is mode [A]. In C. Jewitt (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis [ C ]. London & New York: Routledge.
  • 7Lemke, J. 2002. Travels in hypermodality [ J ]. Visual Communication, (3) : 299 - 325.
  • 8Martinec, R. & A. Salway. 2005. A system for image-text relations in new ( and old) media [ J ]. Visual Communication, ( 3 ) :337 - 371.
  • 9New London Group. 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures [J ]. Harvard Educational Review, ( 1 ) :60 -92.
  • 10O' Halloran, K. 2005. Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images [ M ]. London & NewYork: Continuum.

二级参考文献87

  • 1张德禄.多模态话语分析综合理论框架探索[J].中国外语,2009,6(1):24-30. 被引量:1708
  • 2胡壮麟.社会符号学研究中的多模态化[J].语言教学与研究,2007(1):1-10. 被引量:1366
  • 3Anthonissen, C. Interaction between visual and ver- bal communication: Changing patterns in the printed media [ A]. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (eds.). Critical Discourse Analysis and lnterdisciplinarity ~C]. New York: Palgrave Macndllan,2003.297- 311.
  • 4Baldry, A. P. (ed.). Multimodality and Mtdtime- diality in the Distance Learning Age [ C ]. Campobas- so: palladino Editore, 2000.
  • 5Barthes, R. Image, Music, Text[M]. New York: Hill & Wang, 1977.
  • 6Canale, M. & M. Swain. Theoretical bases of com- municative approaches to secofid language teaching and testing[J]. Applied .Unguist/c.s, 1980, 1(1), 1 - 47.
  • 7Cope, B. & M. Kalantfis ( eds.). Multiiitemc~ : Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures [ C]. Melbourne: Macmillan, 2000.9 - 37.
  • 8Forceville, C. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising [M]. London: Routledge, 1996.334.
  • 9Forceville, C. Non-verbal and mulfimtJM metaphor in a cognitive framework: Agendas for research[ A], In Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, Rene Dirven & Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez (eels.). Cogn/- tire Iingu~tics : Current Applications and Future Per- spectives [ C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.379 - 402.
  • 10Halliday, M. A. K. Language as Soda/Sem/ot/c: The Social Interpretation of ~e and Meaning [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.

共引文献1901

同被引文献74

引证文献8

二级引证文献153

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部