期刊文献+

城市轨道交通风险管理与可接受风险水平的探讨 被引量:6

Discussion on Risk Management of Transit and Acceptable Risk Level
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合城市轨道交通运营安全评估课题的研究,对国际上风险管理、可接受风险等概念,以及个人生命风险、社会风险、常见风险的可接受风险标准等做出阐述。文章详细介绍了城市轨道交通如何全面采用风险管理确保运营安全,运用系统安全理论(RAMS、系统生命周期)、工程风险分析与管理技术以确保系统运行始终处于风险管理控制之下,并对在依法、合理的范围内保证城市轨道交通系统运行的人员、财产和环境安全的相关措施提出建议。 Based on the study of operational safety assessment project of urban rail transit, the paper makes a brief description of the international practices of risk management, the level of acceptable risk concept, the acceptable risk criteria of individual life risk, social risk, and common risks. It introduces in-detail the method of full use of risk management in safe operation of urban rail transit, applying the theory of system safety (RAMS, system life cycle), project risk analysis and management techniques to ensure system operation always under the control of risk management. Meanwhile it makes some recommendations on some related measures abiding by laws and within reasonable range to guarantee operation personnel safety, property and environmental safety of the urban rail transit system.
出处 《现代城市轨道交通》 2016年第4期99-102,共4页 Modern Urban Transit
关键词 城市轨道交通 风险管理 可接受风险 水平 ALARP准则 urban rail transit, risk management, acceptablerisk level, ALARP standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1中国城市轨道交通年度报告课题组.城市轨道交通2016年度统计和分析报告[R].北京:北京交通大学出版社,2016.
  • 2巴鲁克·菲施霍夫,汤雯雯,宋华琳.可接受的风险:一个概念建议[J].交大法学,2011(1):85-105. 被引量:7
  • 3S.N. Jonkman. An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage[J/OL].http://citeseerx. ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download ?doi=10.1.1.5.1063&rep=repl &type=pdf, 2003.
  • 4尚志海,刘希林.国外可接受风险标准研究综述[J].世界地理研究,2010,19(3):72-80. 被引量:39
  • 5Per Hokstad. Overall Strategy for risk evaluation and priority setting of risk regulations[J/ OL]. http://www.deepdyve.com/lp/elsevier/overall-strategy-for-risk-evaluation- and-priority- setting-o f-risk-d 1G1XZgvyV, 2006.

二级参考文献29

  • 1Hunter P R,Fewtrell L. Acceptable risk [A]. Water quality:Guidelines,standards and health [C]. London:IWA Publishing, 2001.207-227.
  • 2Aven T. On the ethical justification for the use of risk acceptance criteria[J]. Risk Analysis, 2007,27 (2) : 303-312.
  • 3Velokhin A N, Sizov Y I,Tshovrebov Y V. The criteria of acceptable risk in Russia[J]. Journal of Risk Research,2004,7(6):609-612.
  • 4Wigger P,Hovel R. Safety assessment-Application of CENELEC standards[A]. Proceedings of the metro inauguration seminar[C]. Copenhagen:Copenhagen Metro Inauguration Seminar, 2002.1-10.
  • 5Aven T A. Semi-quantitative approach to risk analysis,as an alternative to QPAs [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2008,93(6):768-775.
  • 6EM-DAT. Summarized Table of Natural Disasters in China P Repfrom 1980 to 2000[DB/OL]. http://www. emdat, be/Database/OisasterList/list, php, 2009-03-15.
  • 7ISDR. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015:Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters[R].Kobe,Hyogo,Japan:World Conference on Disaster Reduction,2005.
  • 8Aven T,Vinnem J E,Wiencke H S. A decision framework for risk management,with application to the offshore oil and gas industry[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2007,92(4):433-448.
  • 9Fell R,Cororninas J, Bonnard C, etal. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk-zoning for land use planning[J]. Engineering Geology,2008,102(3-4):85-98.
  • 10Lind N. Social and economic criteria of acceptable risk[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2002,78(1):21-25.

共引文献44

同被引文献38

引证文献6

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部