短信提醒督促服药时间在结肠镜检查肠道准备中的应用价值被引量：5

Use of mobile-phone short message service reminders to assure the preparation-to-colonoscopy interval before bowel preparation for colonoscopy

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的：探讨短信提醒督促服药时间在改善结肠镜检查肠道准备清洁程度中的价值。方法：前瞻性入组100例患者,随机分为短信提醒组和对照组（n=50）。短信提醒组于肠镜检查前6h通过手机短信督促服用聚乙二醇电解质散2L,对照组不予短信提醒。采用渥太华肠道准备评分量表比较两组间肠道准备清洁程度。结果：与对照组相比,短信提醒组更多患者将肠道准备到肠镜检查（preparation-to-colonoscopy,PC）间隔时间控制在3~5h（62%vs 15%,P=0.001）。短信提醒组肠道清洁程度明显优于对照组（渥太华肠道准备评分,3.2±2.1 vs 4.8±2.4,P=0.001）。结论：采用短信提醒可有效保证最优的服药时间窗,从而改善肠道准备质量。 Objective：To explore the value of short message service（SMS）alerts to urge the time of taking medicine in improving the bowel preparation for colonoscopy.Methods：Prospectively enrolled 100 patients were randomly divided into the SMS alert group and the control group（n=50）.In the SMS alert group,patients received an SMS alert 6hbefore colonoscopy that reminded them of taking 2Lpolyethylene glycol（PEG）.There was no SMS alert for patients in the control group.The bowel preparation quality of the two groups was compared with the Ottawa bowel preparation scale.Results：Compared with the control group,more patients in the SMS alert group limited the preparation-to-colonoscopy（PC）interval time to 3to 5h（62%vs 15%,P=0.001）.The bowel preparation quality of the SMS alert group was significantly better than that of the control group（Ottawa bowel preparation score：3.2±2.1 vs 4.8±2.4,P=0.001）.Conclusions：SMS alerts can effectively ensure the optimal time window of taking medicine so as to improve the quality of bowel preparation.

作者周军明顾奇芳高奕鸣王毅谈培英张蕾杨笑

机构地区江苏省江阴市南闸医院消化内科

出处《中国临床医学》 2016年第3期358-361,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine

关键词肠道准备结肠镜短信提醒 bowel preparation colonoscopy short message service（SMS）alert

分类号 R574 [医药卫生—消化系统]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U. S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002, 97: 1296-1308.
2Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2003, 5876-79.
3Bernstein C, Thorn M, Monsees K, et al. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2005, 61:72-75.
4Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study [J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2005, 61..378-384.
5Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001, 96.. 1797-1802.
6Chung YW, Han DS, Park KH, et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol., a prospective study in Korea [J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2009, 43 448-452.
7Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ, et al. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009, 69 : 700-706.
8Eun CS, Han 198, Hyun YS, et al. The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2011, 56..539-544.
9Seo EH, Kim TO, Park MJ, et al. Optimal preparation-tocolonoscopy interval in split-dose PEG bowel preparation determines satisfactory bowel preparation quality: an observational prospective study [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2012, 75:583-590.
10Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2004, 59..482-486.