期刊文献+

不同亲属关系活体供肾肾移植长期疗效分析 被引量:2

Long-term curative effect of different relatives living donor kidney transplant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察亲属活体供肾来源的肾移植长期疗效,对比分析不同亲属关系供肾的临床效果。方法回顾性分析郑州人民医院2008年4月至2014年2月完成的237例亲属活体供肾移植的临床资料,按供肾来源分为母供→子组(A组,82例),父供→子组(B组,34例),母供→女儿组(C组,51例),父供→女儿组(D组,26例),兄弟姐妹间男供→女组(E组,19例),兄弟姐妹间女供→男组(F组,25例)。观察记录各组术后各时间点血肌酐水平、蛋白尿发生情况、感染和排斥反应发生率等。结果随访2 a,无供受者死亡或移植物丢失,人/肾存活率100%;围术期均无感染发生,肺部感染多发生在术后2~4个月,排斥反应也多发生在肺部感染、腹泻后,各组肺部感染、排斥反应、腹泻、骨髓抑制及肝毒性等并发症比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。术后1 a A组受者血肌酐水平升高,均高于其他组受者(P〈0.05),但D组受者血肌酐水平术后持续低于其他组(P〈0.05);术后A组中有6例患者持续存在蛋白尿,蛋白尿发生率高于其他组(P〈0.05)。结论亲属活体供肾移植具有较好疗效,母亲供肾给儿子移植后长期疗效相对较差,父亲供肾给女儿移植疗效相对较佳。 Objective To observe the long-term effect of relatives living donor kidney sources renal transplantation and compare the clinical effect of different kinship donor kidney in kidney transplantation patients. Methods The clinical data of237 cases relatives living donor renal transplantation in the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou from April 2008 to February 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the renal source,237 cases were divided into the mother→son group( group A,82cases),father→son group( group B,34 cases),mother→daughter group( group C,51 cases),father→daughter group( group D,26 cases),brothers and sisters male → female group( group E,19 cases),brothers and sisters for female → male group( group F,25 cases). The time of serum creatinine returned to normal after operation,serum creatinine levels at each time point,condition of urine protein,incidence of infection and rejection of patients in each group were observed and recorded. Results In 2 years follow-up,no donor-recipient death or graft loss,and the patients / renal survival rate was 100%. No infection occurred in perioperative; the pulmonary infection occurred in 2- 4 months postoperative; rejection occurred after lung infections and diarrhea; there was no statistic difference of lung infection,rejection,diarrhea,bone marrow suppression and hepatic toxicity of patients in each group( P〉0. 05). The serum creatinine levels of recipients in group A were significantly higher than those in other groups at one year after operation( P〈0. 05); and the serum creatinine levels of recipients in group D were continuous lower than those in other groups( P〈0. 05). After operation,6 patients with persistent proteinuria in group A; and the incidence of proteinuria in group A was higher than that in other groups( P〈0. 05). Conclusion The relatives living donor kidney sources renal transplantation has good clinical effect; and father → daughter group has better long clinical effect,but mother→son group has bad clinical effect.
出处 《新乡医学院学报》 CAS 2016年第7期600-602,共3页 Journal of Xinxiang Medical University
关键词 肾移植 亲属关系 活体供肾 血肌酐 蛋白尿 kidney transplant relatives living donor kidney serum creatinine proteinuria
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1金昊,昌盛.亲属活体肾移植的发展和现状[J].中华器官移植杂志,2006,27(5):318-320. 被引量:35
  • 2LIU G, LI X, LIU T, et al. Gender disparity of living donor renal transplantation in East China [ J ]. Clin Transplant, 2013,27 ( 1 ) : 98-103.
  • 3聂海波,于立新,胡卫列,吕军,朱云松,张小明,王蔚,肖远松,邱晓拂,张利朝.亲属活体肾移植受者119例临床总结[J].广东医学,2009,30(5):721-724. 被引量:9
  • 4LEE J H,WON J H, OH C K. Impact of the ratio of graft kidney volume to recipient body surface ma on graft function after live do- nor kidney transplantation [ J ]. Clin Transplant, 2011,25 ( 6 ) : E647-E655.
  • 5HUH K H,YUN M, KIM T S,et al. Measurement of donor kidney functional renal volume and glomerular filtration rate to predict al- lograft function during the post-transplantation period [ J ]. Nephron Clin Pract 12009,113 (4) : c262-c269.
  • 6王宣传,许明,戎瑞明,唐群业,孙立安,王国民,朱同玉.微嵌合体在母亲子女之间活体肾移植中的作用[J].中华医学杂志,2011,91(8):508-511. 被引量:4
  • 7OTSUKA Y,TAKEDA A, HORIKE K,et al. Early recurrence of active IgA nephropathy after kidney transplantation [ J ]. Nephrology (Carlton) ,2014,19 (Suppl 3 ) :4548.

二级参考文献48

  • 1广州中山医院附属一院外科.同种异体肾移植1例临床报告[J].新医学,1974,5(12):593-593.
  • 2KASISKEB,RAVENSCRAFTM,RAMOSEL,et al.The evaluation of living renal transplant donors:Clinical practice guidelines[J].J Am Soc Nephrol,1996,7:2 288-2 300.
  • 3ADAMA P,COHEN D J,DANOVITCH G M,et al.The nondlrcted live -kidney donor:ethical considerations and practice guidelines:a national conference report[J].Transplantationm,2002,74:582-587.
  • 4SPEISER D E,JEANNET M.Renal transplantation to sersitized patient:decreased graft sutvivial probability associated with appositive historical crossmatch[J].Transplan Immunol,1995,3:330-334.
  • 5JOHN D,ROSENDALE,MAUREEN A,et al.Organ Donation in the United states:1998 -2000.In Clinical transplant 2001[R].Los Angeles:UCLA Immunogenetics Center,2001:87-95.
  • 6NAIR M P,NAMPOOHY M R,SAID T,et al.Early acute rejecion episodes inrenal transplantation in relation to immunosuppres-sion protocols:an audit of 100 ease[J].Transplant Proc,2005,37(7):3 029-3 030.
  • 7THOMAS M C,MATCHEW T H,RASS G R,et al.Periooperatire blood pressure control,delayed graft function,and acute rejeetion after renal transplantation[J].Transplantatiou,2003,75 (12):1 989-1 995.
  • 8SHOCKES D A,SHAHED A R,KIM S.Delayed graft function.Influnce on outcome and strategies for prevention[J].Urol Clin North Am,2001,28(4):721-732.
  • 9Sayegh MH, Carpenter CB. Transplantation 50 years later: progress, challenges, and promises. N Engl J Med, 2004,351 : 2761-2766.
  • 10OPTN/SRTR Data. OPTN/SRTR 2008 annual report [R/OL]. 2008 [2008-05-01]. http ://optn. transplant, hrsa. gov/.

共引文献45

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部