期刊文献+

声带突肉芽肿的抑酸药物治疗 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 声带突肉芽肿是发生在杓状软骨声带突的良性增生性病变,目前具体发病机制还不十分明确,但一般认为主要与用声过度、咽喉反流及气管插管损伤有关,且前两者常同时存在,相互影响。对于声带突肉芽肿的治疗,目前主要有嗓音矫正治疗、抑酸药物治疗、手术治疗、肉毒杆菌毒素注射疗法及联合治疗等[1]。近年来随着对声带突肉芽肿病因及发病机制的不断研究,特别是对咽喉反流疾病研究的深入,认为咽喉反流是引起声带突肉芽肿的一个重要原因[2],故目前普遍认同抑酸疗法是治疗声带突肉芽肿的首选疗法[1,3,4]。
作者 张丽 陈金湘
出处 《中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科》 CSCD 2016年第7期419-420,共2页 Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Karkos PD, George M, Van Der Veen J, et al. Vocal process granulomas: a systematic review of treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2014, 123: 314-320.
  • 2Ylitalo R, Ramel S. Extraesophageal reflux in patients with contact granuloma., a prospective controlled study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2002, 111: 441-446.
  • 3Hillel AT, Lin LM, Samlan R, et al. Inhaled Tria-mcinolone with proton pump inhibitor for treatment of vocal process granulomas: aseries of 67 granulomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2010, 119: 325-330.
  • 4李进让,郭红光,陈曦,孙建军.喉接触性肉芽肿的药物治疗[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008,43(5):387-388. 被引量:11
  • 5Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity andreliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope, 2001, 111: 1313-1317.
  • 6Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index ( RSI ). Voice, 2002, 16: 274-277.
  • 7郑宏良,陈东辉.咽喉反流疾病的诊治亟待规范[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2013,48(6):441-444. 被引量:28
  • 8Shoffel-Havakuk H, Halperin D, Yosef L, et al. Lesions of the posterior glottis: clinical and pathologic considerations and treatment outcome. J Voice, 2014, 28: el-e263.
  • 9Hong-Gang D, He-Juan J, Chun-Quan Z, e~ al. Surgery and proton pump inhibitors for treatment of vocal process granulomas.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 270: 2921- 2926.
  • 10黄靖,唐海红,温武,李兆基.声带突肉芽肿的临床治疗分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2013,20(8):432-434. 被引量:8

二级参考文献50

  • 1李迈群,罗志宏,杨强.硫酸锌治疗气管插管后并发喉肉芽肿[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1994,8(5):283-284. 被引量:4
  • 2倪鑫,马丽晶,韩德民,葛秀明.喉接触性肉芽肿的治疗[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2007,14(2):79-81. 被引量:29
  • 3Ylitalo R, Lindestad PA. Laryngeal findings in patients with contact granuloma: a long-time follow-up study. Acta Otolaryngol, 2000, 120:655-659.
  • 4Jaroma M, Pakarinen L, Nuutinen J. Treatment of vocal cord granuloma. Acta Otolaryngol, 1989, 107:296-299.
  • 5Pontes P, De Biase N, Kyrillos L, et al. Importance of glottic configuration in the development of posterior laryngeal granuloma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2001, 110:765-769.
  • 6Havas TE, Priestley J, Lowinger DS. A management strategy for vocal process granulomas. Laryngoscope, 1999, 109 ( 2 Pt 1 ) : 301-306.
  • 7Ylitalo R, Ramel S. Gastroesophagopharyngeal reflux in patients with contact granuloma: a prospective controlled study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2002, 111:178-183.
  • 8McFerran DJ, Abdullah V, Gallimore AP, et al. Vocal process granulomata. J Laryngol Otol, 1994, 108:216-220.
  • 9Zeitels SM, Casiano RR, Gardner GM, et al. Management of common voice problems: Committee report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Stag, 2002,126:333-348.
  • 10Nasri S, Serearz JA, McAlpin T, et al. Treatment of vocal fold granuloma using botulinum toxin type A. Laryngoscope, 1995, 105 : 585-588.

共引文献43

同被引文献153

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部