期刊文献+

基于自然驾驶数据的避撞预警对跟车行为影响 被引量:14

Impacts of Collision Warning System on Carfollowing Behavior Based on Naturalistic Driving Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于60 689 km车辆运行数据提取了1 613个跟车行为片段,并分析了前向避撞预警(FCW)系统对跟车行为2个重要参数——车头时距和反应时间的影响.结果表明,FCW系统对跟车车头时距影响不显著,但显著降低了跟车中的反应时间.白天状态下,反应时间减少了0.13 s;后车逼近前车时,反应时间减少了0.09 s. From 60 689 km of naturalistic driving data, 1 613 car-following events were identified. Two major parameters of car-following behavior were analyzed--time headway and reaction time. The results show that forward collision warning(FCW) did not have a significant effect on time headway; while FCW resulted in a 0.13 s decrease of reaction time in daytime driving, and a 0. 09 s decrease when a following vehicle had higher speed than the lead vehicle.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期1045-1051,共7页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(51522810) "十二五"国家科技支撑计划(014BAG01B03)
关键词 前向避撞预警(FCM) 自然驾驶 跟车行为 车头时距 反应时间 forward collision warning (FCW) naturalistic driving study car-following behavior headway time reaction time
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1McGehee D, Brown T, Lee J, et el. Effect of warning timing on collision avoidance behavior in a stationary lead vehicle scenario [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002, 1803: 1.
  • 2Soma H, Hiramatsu K. Driving simulator experiment on drivers' behaviour and effectiveness of danger warning against emergency braking of leading vehicle [C]//Proceedings of the 16th ESV, Canada. Washington D C.. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 1998.
  • 3Ranney T A. Psychological factors that influence car-following and car-following model development [ J]. Transportation Research, Part F.. Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1999, 2 (4) : 213.
  • 4Ben-Yaacov A, Maltz M, Shinar D. Effects of an in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system on short- and long-term driving performance [J]. Human Factors.. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2002, 44(2).. 335.
  • 5Dingus T A, McGehee D V, Manakkal N, et al. Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices [J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1997, 39(2) : 216.
  • 6Ervin R, Sayer J, LeBlanc D, et al. Automotive Collision Avoidance System field operational test report., methodology and results [R]. Washington D C: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 2005.
  • 7Gurusinghe G, Nakatsuji T, Azuta Y, et al. Multiple car- following data with real-time kinematic global positioning system [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002, 1802: 166.
  • 8Taylor J, Zhou X, Rouphail N M, et al. Method for investigating intra driver heterogeneity using vehicle trajectory data., a dynamic time warping approach [J]. Transportation Research, Part B: Methodological, 2015, 73: 59.
  • 9Fitch G M, Hanowski R J. Using naturalistic driving research to design, test and evaluate driver assistance systems [M]// Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles. London: Springer, 2012: 559-580.
  • 10Zhang G, Wang Y, Wei H, et al. Examining headway distribution models with urban freeway loop event data [J]. Transportation Research Record.. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, 1999.. 141.

同被引文献119

引证文献14

二级引证文献154

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部