摘要
目的探讨水飞蓟素对大鼠肺缺血再灌注损伤的作用及其可能机制。方法选择220~250g的健康雄性sD大鼠36只,随机分为3组(n=12):假手术组(S组)、缺血再灌注组(IR组)和水飞蓟素处理组(SM组)。s组:仅行左侧开胸,不行缺血再灌注处理;IR组:建立大鼠LIRI模型,夹闭左侧肺门,阻断45rain后,再灌注120rain;SM组:动物模型建立前经腹腔注射水飞蓟素250ng/(kg·d),6d;s组和IR组均注射等剂量生理盐水。实验结束后,留取各组大鼠左肺组织标本。严格按照试剂盒操作步骤检测肺组织丙二醛(MDA)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素(IL)_6、IL.113含量及超氧化物歧化酶(soo)活性;原位缺口末端标记法(TUNEL)法测定肺组织细胞凋亡指数(AI);计算肺组织渺干重之比(W/D)。结果与s组比较,IR组和SM组W/D(6.53±0.65、5.67±0.52比5.14±0.42),MDA[(8.25±0.56)、(6.27±0.40)比(2.28±0.13)nmol/mg蛋白]、核因子(Nr).KB(50.22±1.86、35.41±1.34比10.28±0.49)、TNF-q(251.54±10.16、153.28±7.86比68.32±2.55)、IL-6(4.92±0.42、3.16±o.32比1.70±0.21)、IL-1B(5.42±0.53、4.24±0.62比2.53±0.21)含量增加,AI(16.75±1.83、11.24±1.55比2.58±0.32)增加,SOD[(5.58±1.26)、(9.38±1.76)比(24.32±1.85)U/mg蛋白]活性降低(P〈0.05);与IR组比较。SN组W/O(5.67±0.52比6.53±0.65),NDA[(6.27±0.40)比(8.25±0.56)nmol/mg蛋白]、NF.KB(35.41±1.34比50.22±1.86)、TNF-α(153.28±7.86比251.54±10.16)、IL-6(3.16±0.32比4.92±0.42)、IL-113(4.24±0.62比5.42±0.53)含量降低,AI(11.24±1.55比16.75±1.83)减少,SOD[(9.38±1.76)比(5.58±1.26)U/mg蛋白]活性增加(P〈0.05)。结论水飞蓟素可减轻大鼠肺缺血再灌注损伤,其肺保护作用的机制可能与其抗氧化应激、抗炎及抗细胞凋亡有关。
Objective To investigate the protective effects of silymarin on lung ischemia -reperfu- sion injury in rats and the possible underlying mechanism. Methods A total of 36 male Sprague - Dawley rats (weighing 220 -250 g) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 12 each) : sham group (S group), ischemia - reperfusion group ( IR group), and silymarin - treated group ( SM group). Animals in SM group were given an intraperitoneal injection of silymarin [250 mg/(kg.d) in 1 ml saline] before operation for 6 days. At the end of experiment, the left lung was harvested. The activity of superoxide dismutase ( SOD), the levels of nuclear factor- κB (NF- κB), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL) -6, IL - 1β, and malondialdehyde (MDA) were detected according to the description of kits. The apoptosis in- dex (AI) of the cells in lung tissue was detected by terminal -deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. The ratio of wet/dry weight (W/D) was tested. Results Compared with S group: IR group and SM group W/D ( 6. 53 ± 0. 65, 5.67 ± 0. 52 vs. 5.14 ±0. 42), MDA [ ( 8.25 ± 0. 56), (6. 27 s0. 40) vs. (2. 28±0. 13) nmol/mg.protl, NF - KB (50. 22 ± 1.86, 5.41 ± 1.34 vs. I0. 28 ± 0. 49), TNF -α (251.54 ± 10. 16, 153.28 ± 7. 86 vs. 68. 32 :t: 2. 55 ), IL - 6 (4. 92 ± 0. 42, 3. 16 ± 0. 32 vs. 1.70 ± 0. 21 ), IL - 1β (5- 42 ± 0. 53, 4. 24 ± 0. 62 vs. 2. 53 ± 0. 21 ) were increased, AI (16.75±1.83, 11.24 ±1.55 vs. 2.58 ±0.32) were increased, SOD [(5.58 ± 1.26), (9.38 ±1.76) vs. (24. 32 ± 1.85) U/mg.prot] were decreased (P 〈0. 05) ; Compared with IR group: SM group W/D (5.67 ±0.52 vs. 6.53 ±0.65), MDA [(6.27 ±.40) vs. (8.25 ±0.56) nmol/mg.prot], NF-κB(35.41 ±1.34 vs. 50. 22 ±1.86), TNF-α (153.28±.86 vs. 251.54±10.16), IL-6 (3. 16 ±. 32 vs. 4. 92 ±0.42), IL - 1β (4. 24 ±0. 62 vs. 5.42 ±0. 53) were deereased, AI (11.24 ± 1.55 vs. 16. 75±1.83) were deereased, SOD [ (9. 38 ±1.76 vs. 5.58 ±1.26) U/mg-prot] were in- creased ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Silymarin can reduee lung isehemia - reperfusion injury, whieh may be related to anti -oxidalion, anti -inflammatory and anti- apoptosis.
出处
《中华实验外科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第8期1935-1937,共3页
Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery