期刊文献+

合肥市医生绩效评价满意度的现状调查与分析 被引量:2

Survey and Analysis on Doctors ' Satisfaction of Performance Evaluation in Hefei
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究合肥市医生绩效评价满意度影响因素,为医院管理者完善绩效评价体系提供依据。方法采用随机抽样的方法对合肥市医生的绩效评价满意度进行问卷调查。结果合肥市医生对绩效评价总体满意度一般,尚未达到满意标准,仅有25.9%的医生对绩效评价感到满意,医生对绩效评价各维度的满意比例均不足30%。不同性别、工作年限、月均收入医生之间满意度水平存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论健全绩效评价的沟通反馈机制,扭转岗位薪酬和绩效薪酬之间的失衡,对完善绩效评价体系和深化医院内部体制改革有着重要意义。 Objective Studying the influence factors on satisfaction of doctors'performance evaluation in Hefei to provide basis for improving the performance evaluation system. Methods Investigating the satisfaction of the doctors in performance evaluation in the form of questionnaire with the method of random sampling. Results 25.9% of the doctors were satisfied with the performance evaluation. The proportion of satisfaction on each dimension of the performance evaluation was below 30%. The satisfactions were different among doctors with different sex,working years and average monthly income, and the differences were statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions Improving the feedback mechanism of performance evaluation and adjusting the salary structure timely has a far - reaching influence on perfecting performance evaluation system and deepening the reform of hospital internal mechanism in public hospital.
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2016年第13期1638-1641,共4页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
基金 国家社会科学基金(15BGL190)
关键词 绩效评价 满意度 医生 Performance evaluation Satisfaction Doctor
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献48

  • 1张轶文,甘怡群.中文版Utrecht工作投入量表(UWES)的信效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(3):268-270. 被引量:512
  • 2肖黎.分层AHP法在确定二级医院绩效评价指标体系权重中的应用[J].医学与社会,2006,19(4):60-63. 被引量:8
  • 3李勇,李卫平.我国医院成本核算研究的演进与展望[J].中国卫生事业管理,2007,23(4):247-249. 被引量:26
  • 4中共中央.国务院.中共中央国务院关于深化医药卫生体制改革的意见[Z].2009.
  • 5钱海波 胡善联.RBRVS研究评介.中国卫生经济,1993,(9).
  • 6中共中央,国务院.中共中央国务院关于深化医疗卫生体制改革的意见[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:3.
  • 7Sehaufeli W B, Salanova M, Gonzalez-Roma V, etal. The mea- surement of engagement and burnout: a two-sample confirmatory fac- tor analytic approach[J]. J Happiness Stud, 2002 (3) : 71-92.
  • 8Sehaufeli W B, Bakker A B. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a muhi-sample study[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25 (3) : 293-315.
  • 9Demerouti E Bakker A B, De Jonge J, et al. Burnout and engage- ment at work as a function of demands and control[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 2001, 27: 279-286.
  • 10Fogarty T J, Singh J, Rhoads G K, et al. Antecedents and consequences of bumout in accounting beyond the role stress model [J]. Behav Res Accounl, 2000, 12: 31-67.

共引文献87

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部