期刊文献+

棘突间动态稳定装置Coflex治疗退行性腰椎疾病的临床疗效分析

Clinical efficacy analysis of coflex interspinous stabilization in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨棘突间动态稳定装置Coflex治疗退行性腰椎疾病的临床疗效。方法回顾性研究我院2009年1月至2013年12月采用Coflex治疗的173例退行性腰椎疾病患者。单纯Coflex治疗104例,男47例,女57例;年龄27~84岁,平均57.8岁;Topping-off治疗69例,男37例,女32例,年龄39~78岁,平均59.4岁。记录手术时间、术中出血量及术后并发症。选用Oswestry功能障碍指数(oswestry disability index,ODI)、视觉模拟评分(visual analogues-cale,VAS)评价临床疗效。拍摄腰椎站立位的正侧位X片,测量并记录Coflex节段的术前、术后3个月、术后1年、终末随访时的椎间角度和椎体后缘高度。结果本组随访12~64个月,平均(28.1±12.2)个月。单纯Coflex的平均手术时间(92.2±24.6)min,平均出血量(195.5±62.2)ml;Topping-off的平均手术时间(173.7±28.7)min,平均出血量(415.5±80.7)ml。单纯Coflex术后伤口感染2例,术后5年翻修1例;Topping-off术后伤口感染2例,椎管内血肿2例,术后3年Coflex置入节段翻修1例,术后3年融合节段下位椎间盘突出行二次手术1例。术后1年随访的腰痛及腿痛VAS评分、ODI评分与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。Coflex置入节段术后3个月椎间角度均小于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05),术后1年、终末椎间角度与术前比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);术后3个月椎体后缘高度均大于术前,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),术后1年、终末椎体后缘高度与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论棘突间动态稳定装置Coflex治疗退行性腰椎疾病的中短期随访临床疗效满意,Coflex节段的椎间角度及椎体后缘高度术后短期内可获得明显的改善。 Objective To discuss the clinical results of Coflex interspinous stabilization for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Methods From January 2009 to December 2013, 173 patients with degenerative lumbar disease receiving Coflex implantation were retrospectively investigated. Coflex treatment were performed in 104 cases,including47 males and 57 females,the mean age was 57.8 years old(27-84 years). Topping-off operation was performed in 69 cases, including 37 males and 32 females, the mean age was 59.4 years old(39-78 years). The operation time,intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were recorded. Oswestry disability index(ODI) and visual analogue scale(VAS)were used to evaluate the clinical results. The inter-vertebral angle and the posterior vertebral body-height in the Coflex implant segments were measured and recorded by the Anterior-posterior and lateral X-ray radiograph during before operation, 3 months and 1 years after operation, and final follow-up. Results All patients were followed-up with an average of 28.1 ± 12.2months(12- 64 months). The average time was 92.2 ± 24.6min and the average blood loss was 195.5 ±62.2ml in Coflex surgery. The average operation time was 173.7±28.7min and the average blood loss was 415.5±80.7ml in Topping-off surgery. After Coflex surgery,incision infection happened in 2 cases,revision occurred after five years in 1cases. After Topping-off operation, incision infection happened in 2 cases, intraspinal hematoma were discovered in 2 cases, revision occurred after three years in 2 cases respectively owing to recurrence in Coflex implant segmentand intervertebral disc herniation underfusion segment. Preoperative VAS, ODI scores were statistically different 1 year after the operation(P〈0.05). In Coflex implant segments, intervertebral angle of 3 months after operation was less than the angle of after operation and the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05). Comparing the preoperative angle, there were no significant difference could be found between 1 year or final follow-up after surgery(P〈0.05). Posterior vertebral bodyheight 3 months after operation was more than that of before the operation and the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05). there were no significant difference in the preoperative height, 1 years and final follow-up after surgery(P〈0.05). Conclusion Coflex interspinous stabilization in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease could obtain satisfied clinical results in the short-medium term followed-up. In Coflex implanted segments, the intervertebral angle and the posterior vertebral body-height show significant improvement in the short term after surgery.
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 2016年第7期648-653,共6页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 退行性腰椎疾病 棘突间 COFLEX Topping-off degenerative lumbar disease(DLD) Interspinous Coflex Topping-off
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Musacchio M J, Lauryssen C, Davis R J, et al. Evaluation of Decom- pression and Interlaminar Stabilization Compared with Decompres- sion and Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 5- year Follow-up of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial[J]. Int J Spine Surg, 2016, 10:doi: 10.14444. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 2Alentado V J, Lubelski D, Healy AT, et al. Predisposing Characteris- tics of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Lumbar Fusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2016, 10:doi: 10.1097 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 3Kim JY, Ryu DS, Paik hk, et al. Paraspinal muscle, facet joint, and disc problems: risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration afver lumbarfusion[J]. Spine J, 2016.doi: 10.1016. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 4梁昌详,昌耘冰,沈梓维,詹世强,曾时兴,尹东,郑晓青.椎管减压棘突间Coflex置入术治疗L4/5退变性腰椎管狭窄症的5年随访结果[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2014,24(12):1072-1078. 被引量:21
  • 5Roder C, Baumgartner B, Berlemann U, et al. Superior outcomes of decompression with an interlaminar dynamic device versus decom- pression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain: a cross registry study[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24:2228-2235.
  • 6Lee SH, Seol A, Cho TY, et al. A Systematic Review of Interspinous Dynamic Stabilization[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2015, 7:323-329.
  • 7Bae HW, Lauryssen C, Maislin G, et al. Therapeutic sustainability and durability of coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompres- sion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a four year assessment[J]. Int J Spine Surg, 2015, 9:doi: 10.14444.
  • 8Davis R J, Errico TJ, Bae H, et al. Decompression and Coflex inter- laminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrument- ed spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis : two-year results from the prospective, random- ized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2013, 38:1529- 1539.
  • 9Davis R, Auerbaeh JD, Bae H, et al. Can low-grade spondylolisthe- sisbe effectively treated by either coflex interlaminarstabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Twoyearclinical and ra- diographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemptiontrial: clinical article[J]. J Neu- rosurg Spine, 2013, 19:174-184.
  • 10王振林,黄培培,焦海斌,梁卓文,胡学昱,王哲.Coflex与融合治疗腰椎管狭窄症的中期疗效及对相邻节段退变影响的对比观察[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2016,24(1):24-29. 被引量:16

二级参考文献47

  • 1Simotas AC. Nonoperative treatment for lumber spinal stenosis[J].Clin Orthop, 2001, 384:153-161.
  • 2Boos N, Webb JK. Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders : aEuropean view[J]. Eur Spine J, 1997, 6:2-18.
  • 3Sengupta DK. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatmentof low back pain[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2004, 35:43-56.
  • 4Madan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of the Graf ligamentoplasty proce-dure compared with anterior lumbar interbody fusion with theHartshillhorseshoe cage[J]. Eur Spine J,2003, 12:361-368.
  • 5Amundsen T, Weber H, Lille.s F, et al. Lumbar spinal steno-sis.Clinical and radiologic features [J]. Spine, 1995, 20:1178-1186.
  • 6Puolakka K, Ylinen J, Neva MH,et al. Risk factors for backpain -related loss of working time after surgery for lumbar dischemiation:a 5-year follow-up study [J]. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17:386-392.
  • 7Lafage V, Ganget N, Senegas J, et al. New interspinous implant e-valuation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with afinite-element analysis[J]. Spine, 2007, 32:1706-1713.
  • 8Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, et al. A prospective random-ized ulti2center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosiswith the X-STOP interspinous implant: 12year results[J]. Eur SpineJ, 2004, 13:22-31.
  • 9Senegas J. Mechanical supplementation by non -rigid fixation indegenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system[J].Eur Spine J, 2002, 11:164-169.
  • 10Gardner A, Pande KC. Graf ligamentoplasty: a 7-year follow-up[J]. Eur Spine J, 2002,(Suppl 2):S157-163.

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部