期刊文献+

渗出性胸腔积液69例临床分析 被引量:2

Clinial analysis of 69 cases with exudative pleural effusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨常用肿瘤标志物对良恶性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断价值。方法选取自2014年6月至2015年6月住院的69例渗出性胸腔积液患者,根据诊断结果分为良性组(39例)和恶性组(30例),对其临床资料进行比较,以ROC曲线、Logistic回归判断相关指标诊断恶性胸腔积液的价值。结果 2组在性别、胸痛、咯血、消瘦、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞比例、C-反应蛋白、胸水LDH、血清LDH,胸水/血清LDH、血清CA125方面差异无统计学意义,具有可比性;2组在年龄、发热、咳嗽、呼吸困难方面差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);良性组血沉、胸水ADA显著高于恶性组,恶性组胸水CEA、血清CEA、胸水/血清CEA,胸水CA25,胸水/血清CA125,胸水CA199,血清CA199,胸水/血清CA199,血NSE、血Cyfra21-1均显著高于良性组。血Cyfra21-1,胸水CA125,胸水CEA曲线下面积依次为0.871,0.858,0.853。经Logistic回归分析,发热、胸水ADA升高,胸水/血清CEA≤1倾向良性胸腔积液的诊断。结论血Cy-fra21-1,胸水CA125,胸水CEA是诊断恶性胸腔积液较好的指标,发热、胸水ADA升高,胸水/血清CEA≤1倾向良性胸腔积液的诊断。 Objective To summarize the differential diagnosis of clinical presentations and tumour markers for benign or malignant pleural effusion. Methods Sixty-nine cases of hospitalized patients with pleural efusion were enrolled between June 2014 to June 2015. According to the final diagnosis,two groups were divided:benign pleural effusion(BPE)group and malignant pleural effision(MPE) group. Clinic features of the two groups were analyzed. By ROC curve and Logistic regression, the diagnostic value of different laboratory tests for MPE was evaluated. Results 1. There were not significant differences in sex, chest pain, hemoptysis, marasmus, WBC, N%, CRP, LDH and CA125 in blood between the two groups. 2. There were statistical significant diferences in age, fever, cough and dyspnea. The level of ESR and ADA was higher in the BPE group than in the MPE group. The level of CEA, CA199, NSE, Cyfra21- 1 in blood and CEA,CA125, CA199 in effusion and PCEA/SCEA, PCA125/SCA125, PCA199/SCA199 were higher in the MPE group than in the BPE group. 3. The area under ROC curve(AUC) of Cyfra21-1 in serum, CA125 in fluid and CEA in fluid for the diagnosis of MPE was 0.871,0.858,0.853 respectively.4.From Logistic regression, the valuable factors were fever, ADA in effusion and PCEA/SCEA. Conclusion Cyfra21- 1 in serum, CA125 and CEA in fluid are helpful for the diagnosis of MPE.It would lead to the diagnosis of BPE if a patient with fever, high ADA and PCEA/SCEA≤1.
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 2016年第7期703-705,共3页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 胸腔积液 细胞角蛋白片段21-1 癌胚抗原 癌抗原125 pleural effusion cytokeratin fragnant 21-1 carcinoembryonic antigen cancer antigen125
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献64

  • 1罗俊敏,张敬宇.肿瘤标志物联合检测对肺癌的临床价值探讨[J].中国综合临床,2004,20(9):810-811. 被引量:9
  • 2敖日影,谢建春,余模安.肺癌患者胸水CA_(125)、CEA测定及其临床意义[J].临床肺科杂志,2005,10(1):26-27. 被引量:24
  • 3高飞絮,张国龙,吴越.多项肿瘤标志物检测对肿瘤诊断和病情评估的临床价值[J].中原医刊,2006,33(17):18-20. 被引量:7
  • 4Miedouge M, Rouzaud P, Salama G, et al. Evaluation of seven tumomarkers in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of malignant effusion [J]. BrJ Cancer, 1999, 81(6) :1059 -1065.
  • 5Foa P , Fomier M, Miceli R , et al. Tumour markers CEA , NSE , SCC , TPA and CYFRA 21.1 in resectable non - small cell lung cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 1999,19 (4C) : 3613 - 3618.
  • 6Lee JH, Chang JH. Diagnostic utility of serum and pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen, neuron - specific enolase, and cytokeratin 19 fragments in patients with effusions from primary lung cancer [J]. Chest, 2005, 128(4) : 2298 -2303.
  • 7Bonnet JA , Sloan JA , Rowland KM Jr , et al . Significance of neuron - specific enolase levels before and during therapy for small cell lung cancer [J] . Clin Cancer Res , 2000, 6 (2): 597 - 601.
  • 8Barnes PF,Mistry SD,Cooper CL,et al.Compartmentalization of a CD4+ T lymphocyte subpopulation in tuberculous pleuritis.J Immunol,1989,142:1114-1119.
  • 9Chen YM,Yang WK,Whang-Peng J,et al.Elevation of interleukin-10 levels in malignant pleural effusion.Chest,1996,110:433-436.
  • 10Takahashi K,Saito S,Kamamura Y,et al.Prognostic value of CD4+ lymphocytes in pleural cavity of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Thorax,2001,56:639-642.

共引文献22

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部