董事会权力等级、战略性资源配置变动与公司绩效被引量：2

下载PDF

导出

摘要集中于公司董事会权力等级、战略性资源配置变动与公司绩效间关系的研究,认为:公司战略性资源配置变动是董事会权力等级影响公司战略的重要通道之一,其影响作用受组织规模的制约,而公司战略性资源配置变动与公司绩效间则存在非线性关系。实证研究发现:董事会权力等级集中度显著正向影响公司战略性资源配置变动,企业规模越大董事会权力集中度对公司战略性资源配置变动的影响越小。进一步研究发现:公司战略性资源配置变动与公司绩效之间呈倒U型关系。

作者黄文锋张建琦

机构地区中山大学国际金融学院中山大学岭南学院

出处《中山大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期192-201,共10页 Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Social Science Edition)

基金国家自然科学基金面上项目(71572204) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC630090) 广东省教育厅一般项目(2012WYXM_0001) 中央高校基本科研业务费中山大学青年教师培育项目(11wkpy18)

关键词董事会权力等级战略性资源配置公司绩效

分类号 F271 [经济管理—企业管理] F272.5 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献50

1Alexiev, A. S. , Jansen, J. J. P. , Van den Bosch, F. A. J. and Volberda, H. W. , 2010. Top management team ad- vice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47, (7) : 1343-1364.
2Aime, F., Humphrey S., DeRue D. S and Paul B. J., 2014. The Riddle of Heterarchy: Power Transitions in Cross -Functional Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57, (2) : 327-352.
3Atwater, D. C. and Bass, B. M., 1994. Transformational leadership in teams. In Bass, B. M. and Avolio, B. J. (Eds), Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership. 48-83.
4Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Barnard, C., 1938. The functions of the executive. Cam- bridge (MA) : Harvard University Press.
5Berger, J. , Ridgeway, C. L. , Fisek, M. H. , & Norman, R. Z., 1998. The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63, (3) : 379-405.
6Berson, Y. , Shamir, B. , Avolio, B. J. and Popper, M. , 2001. The relationship between vision strength, leadership style, and context. Leadership Quarterly, 12, ( 1 ) : 53-73.
7Bezrukova, K. , Jehn, K. A. , Zanutto, E. L. , & Thatch- er, S. M. B. , 2009. Do workgroup fauhlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20, ( 1 ) :35-50.
8Cannella, A. A. , & Monroe, M. J. , 1997. Contrasting per- spectives on strategic leaders: Toward a more realistic view of top managers. Journal of Management, 23, (3) :213-237.
9Carter, C. B., & Lorsch, J., 2004. Back to the drawing board: Designing corporate boards for a complex world. Bos- ton: Harvard Business School Press.
10Child, J. , 1972. Organization structure and strategies of con- trol: a replication of the Aston study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, (2): 163-177.