期刊文献+

情绪性信息和内在动机对老年人决策过程的影响 被引量:2

The Role of Emotional Information and Internal Motivation in Older Adults' Decision-making Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文主要从四个方面综述了情绪性信息和内在动机对老年人决策过程的影响:任务自我相关性与决策认知资源投入,老年人对决策相关情绪性信息的注意偏向、积极偏好以及对决策任务描述方式的敏感度.未来既需要直接的事件相关电位(ERPs)技术研究证据,如用ERPs技术监测老年人在决策过程中所依据的信息类型以及诱发的情绪和动机反应,从而精确地判断情绪性信息和内在动机对其搜索信息的影响,也需要从神经生物学的视角对老年人的决策过程进行深入的脑机制探讨. The role of emotional information and internal motivation in older adults' decision-making process was explored in this review.The role was embodied in the following four aspects: self-related of tasks influence the invest of cognitive resources; older adults pay more attention to emotional information related to decisions,give preference to positive information and are sensitive to the way of decision-making tasks described.Future research should consider more direct ERPs evidence.For example,use ERPs technique to monitor older adults' decision-making in order to discriminate the information types that older adults used and their emotional and motivational responses.This method could contribute to precisely discern the effect of emotional information and internal motivation on information search.Furthermore,future research should also study the neutral mechanism of older adults' decision-making process from the perspective of neurobiology.
出处 《生物化学与生物物理进展》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期758-767,共10页 Progress In Biochemistry and Biophysics
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地一般项目 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(SKZZY2015074)资助项目~~
关键词 决策过程 情绪性信息 内在动机 事件相关电位技术 decision-making process emotional information internal motivation event-related potentials(ERPs)
  • 相关文献

参考文献64

  • 1Mata R, Nunes L. When less is enough: Cognitive aging, information search, and decision quality in consumer choice. Psychology and Aging , 2010, 25 (2) : 289-298 DOI:10.1037/a0017927.
  • 2Peters E, Dieckmann N F, Weller J. Age differences in complex decision making//Schaie K W, Willis S L. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging.7th. Oxford: Elsevier Inc , 2011 : 133-148.
  • 3Lockenhoff C E, Carstensen L L. Aging, emotion, and health-related decision strategies: Motivational manipulations can reduce age differences. Psychology and Aging , 2007, 22 (1) : 134-146 DOI:10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.134.
  • 4English T, Carstensen L L. Does positivity operate when the stakes are high? Health status and decision making among older adults. Psychology and Aging , 2015, 30 (2) : 348-355 DOI:10.1037/a0039121.
  • 5Schwarz N, Clore G L. Feelings and phenomenal experiences// Kruglanski A, Higgins E T. Social psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. 2nd. New York: Guilford, 2007, 2: 385-407.
  • 6Lang P J, Bradley M M, Cuthbert B N. International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings. US: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, 1999.
  • 7Hess T M. Selective engagement of cognitive resources motivational influences on older adults' cognitive functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 2014, 9 (4) : 388-407 DOI:10.1177/1745691614527465.
  • 8Mata R, Von Helversen B, Rieskamp J. Learning to choose: cognitive aging and strategy selection learning in decision making. Psychology and Aging , 2010, 25 (2) : 299-309 DOI:10.1037/a0018923.
  • 9Hanoch Y, Wood S, Barnes A, et al. Choosing the right medicare prescription drug plan: The effect of age, strategy selection, and choice set size. Health Psychology , 2011, 30 (6) : 719-727 DOI:10.1037/a0023951.
  • 10Hess T M, Queen T L, Ennis G E. Age and self-relevance effects on information search during decision making. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences , 2013, 68 (5) : 703-711 DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbs108.

二级参考文献115

  • 1杨治良,钟毅平.现代实验心理学三种新方法评述[J].心理科学,1996,19(1):44-48. 被引量:13
  • 2李纾.发展中的行为决策研究[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(4):490-496. 被引量:39
  • 3Johnson E J, TverskyA, Affect,generalization,and the perception of risk[J], Journal of personality and Social psychology, 1983,45: 20-31.
  • 4Isen A M, Patrik R. The effects of positive feelings on risk- taking: when the chips are down[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1983,31: 194-202.
  • 5Nygren T E, Isen,A M, Taylor P J, et al. The influence of Positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations: focus on outeome (and especially avoidance of loss) rather than Probability[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 1996.66 (1):59-72.
  • 6Raghunathan P, Pham M T. All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making[J]. Anxiety sadness and decision making, 1999,79(1): 56-77.
  • 7Js Lerner,D Keltner. Fear, anger and risk[J], Journal of personality and social psychology, 2001,81 ; 146-159:.
  • 8Yuen K S L, Lee T M. Could mood state affect risk-taking decision[J]. Journal of Affeetive Disorders, 2003, 75: 11 -18.
  • 9Williams S. Wong We Voon Y. The effects of mood on managerial risk perceptions: Exploring affect and the dimensions of risk[J]. Journal of Social Psychology, 1999, 139( 3): 268-288.
  • 10Leith K P, Baumeister R F. Why do bad moods increase self- defeating behavior? Emotion, risk and self-regulation[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71: 1250-1267.

共引文献41

同被引文献40

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部