期刊文献+

跨期价格歧视与转售价格维持 被引量:9

Intertemporal price discrimination and resale price maintenance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 跨期价格歧视在现实中普遍存在,很多文献研究了垄断厂商实施跨期价格歧视的动因及条件问题.本文基于Salop模型,并假设消费者在评价价值和等待成本两个维度上存在差异,分析了双寡头竞争的纵向市场结构下跨期价格歧视的问题.通过比较两种博弈的结果,得出在一定条件下"跨期价格歧视"博弈中生产商的利润大于"单一定价"博弈中生产商的利润,揭示出转售价格维持可以帮助生产商区分不同类型的消费者,实施跨期价格歧视,获得高利润,而消费者遭受损失.本文的研究结论不仅补充了跨期价格歧视和转售价格维持的理论,而且对于反垄断执法实践具有重要的参考价值. Intertemporal price discrimination is widespread in markets. Many theoretical works have studied the motives and conditions of implementing intertemporal price discrimination. Based on the Salop model, the paper analyzes intertemporal price discrimination within a vertical differentiated duopoly competition market by constructing a model which distinguishes different consumers according to evaluation value and waiting cost. The results show that manufacturers in ' intertemporal price discrimination' game obtain more profits than those in 'uniform pricing' game under certain circumstances. Therefore, resale price maintenance not only helps manufacturers differentiate consumers, but also helps manufacturers implement intertemporal price discrimination which brings more profits while consumers suffer losses. The above conclusions are crucial complements to the existing theory, and may facilitate government antitrust practices.
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期1-9,共9页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172139) 上海财经大学2013年研究生创新基金资助项目(CXJJ-2013-342)
关键词 跨期价格歧视 转售价格维持 Salop模型 等待成本 intertemporal price discrimination resale price maintenance Salop model waiting cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献93

  • 1汪浩.零售商异质性与零售价格维持[J].经济学(季刊),2004,3(B10):125-134. 被引量:14
  • 2胥莉,陈宏民.具有网络外部性特征的企业定价策略研究[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(6):23-30. 被引量:60
  • 3艾兴政,唐小我.基于讨价还价能力的竞争供应链渠道结构绩效研究[J].管理工程学报,2007,21(2):123-125. 被引量:54
  • 4Caminal R. ,and Matute C., 1989, "Endogenous Switching Costs in a Duopoly Model", Journal oflndustrial Organization, vol. 8, 353-- 373.
  • 5Chen Y., 1997, "Paying Customers to Switch", Journal of Econamics and Management Strategy, vol. 6, 877--897.
  • 6Chen Y., 2005, "Oligopoly Price Discrimination by Purchase History", The Pros and Cons of Price Discrimination, 101--29.
  • 7Doganoglu T., and Grzybowski L., 2004, "Dynamic Duopoly Competition with Switching Costs and Network Externalities", Mimeo.
  • 8Farrell J., and Klemperer P., 2002, "Coordination and Lock--In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects", Handbook of Industrial Organization.
  • 9Fudenberg J., and Tirole J., 2000, "Customer Poaching and Brand Switching", Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, 634--657.
  • 10Katz M. and Shapiro C. , 1985, "Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility", American Eeonomic Review, vol. 75, No. 3, 424-- 440.

共引文献154

同被引文献51

引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部