期刊文献+

英国基础教育问责制评析 被引量:2

Comment of The Accountability Sytem of Basic Education in the United Kingdom
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪80年代以来,英国政府引入市场机制和公民力量加强对学校的问责。随着问责主体和内容日益多元,市场问责取代专业问责成为一种主流的问责机制,多种不同甚至相互冲突的问责要求和问责机制形成了多重问责体系和复杂的问责网。由于问责网中流变的权力关系、问责关系的非对称性和不平等性、问责要求的不合理性与欠充分性、问责结果的可接受性饱受质疑等,导致问责失败。未来的问责制应更多关注同辈评审和学校的内部提高,综合多方视角。 The UK government introduced market mechanism and citizenery power to strengthen accountability over schools since 1980s. With the increasing diversity of types and participants in school accountability, the previous professionalism-oriented accountability system transformed into a market accoutability system. Different even clashing accountability demands and mechanisms constituted multiple accountability and complex accountability netwok. The fluid power relationship in the accountability network, asymmetric and unequal accountability relationship, irrationality and inadequacy of accountability demand, as well as doubts to accountability results led to accountability failure. In the future, accountability design should pay more attention to peer review and internal enhancement of schools, integrating multiple perspectives.
作者 朱春芳
出处 《外国中小学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期6-11,5,共7页 Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad
关键词 问责制 多重问责 问责失败 发展趋势 accountability multiple accountability accountability failure development trend.
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Arthur Midwinter, Local Government inScotland: Reform or Decline. London: PalgraveMcMillan, 1995,pp. 138.
  • 2Anton De Grauwe and Candy Lugaz, “EducationalGovernance At Local Level. DistrictEducation Offices in French-speaking WestAfrica: Autonomy, Professionalism andAccountability,” Prospects, vol. XXX VD , no. 1(2007)’pp. 115.
  • 3Jacqueline Baxter, John Clarke. Farewellto the tick box inspector. Ofsted and thechanging regime of school inspection inEngland[J]. Oxford review of education, 2013,39(5) :702-718.
  • 4Stewart Ranson. Public accountability in theage of neo-liberal governance[J]. Journal ofeducation policy, 2003, 18(5) :464.
  • 5Clyde Chitty. Education policy in Britain[M].Palgrave Macmillan, 2004 .203-204.
  • 6Paola Mattei. Market accountability inschools: policy reforms in England, Germany,France and 11aly[J]. Oxford review ofeducation. 2012,38(3):254-262.
  • 7Anne West, Paola Mattei, Jonathan Roberts.(2011). Accountability and Sanctions inEnglish Schools[J]. British Journal ofEducational Studies,59(1):46-48.
  • 8Thomas Schi1lemans & Mark Bovens. Thechallenge of multiple accountability---Doesredundancy lead to overload.[A]. Melvin J.Dubnick, H. George Frederickson. Accountablegovernance: problems and promises[M]. Armonk,NY, USA: M. E. Sharpe, Inc, 2010.6-8.
  • 9Mark Bovens, Thomas Schi1lemans, and RobertE. Goodin. The Oxford Handbook of PublicAccountability[M]. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2014:233.
  • 10Stephen Exley. Ofsted has ‘lost credibility,with teachers and must improve quality ofinspections, union claims, https ://news,tes. co. uk/b/news/2014/04/14/new-inspection-charter-needs-to-improve-standards-at-quot-broken-quot-ofsted-union-claims. aspx.

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部