期刊文献+

汽油发动机生命周期能源消耗和环境影响评价 被引量:4

Life cycle energy consumptions and environmental impact assessment of the gasoline engine
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究应用生命周期评价方法,依据ISO 14040和ISO 14044等国际标准,通过中国某汽车生产企业的实地调研,核算了汽油发动机的累积能源需求(CED)、全球增温潜势(GWP 100 a)、酸化潜势(AP)、光化学氧化剂形成潜势(POCP)和富营养化潜势(EP)这5个方面的环境影响.结果表明,各类型的环境影响指标中,均是使用阶段的贡献最大,占贡献总量的48%~94%;其次是原材料的获取阶段,原材料的获取阶段对于AP与EP的贡献大于44%,而对于其他类别的环境影响的贡献在9%~27%之间;生产阶段对各种环境影响的贡献小于8%.本研究辨识了汽油发动机全生命周期重大环境影响过程和关键贡献因素,为绿色发动机的设计研发及政府政策的制定提供决策支持. This study aims to evaluate and quantify the life cycle environmental impact of passenger vehicle gasoline engine in accordance with ISO 14040/14044 standards,and to determine the key stages and factors.Life cycle assessment(LCA) methodology is applied,and o N-site investigation data during2014 from one of the largest Chinese automotive company is used for the assessment.Five impact categories(i.e.Cumulative energy demand(CED),global warming potential(GWP),acidification potential(AP),photochemical oxidant creation potential(POCP),and eutrophication potential(EP))are considered.The use stage contributes the most and accounts for 48% ~ 94% of the total to each impact category respectively.The raw material acquisition stage is the second contributor,which accounts for more than 44% of the total to AP and EP and contributes 9% ~ 27% of the total to the other impact categories.The end-of-life stage contributes less than 8% of the total to each impact category respectively.This study provided support on the green engine development and decisio N-making by the authorities.
出处 《环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期3059-3065,共7页 Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
关键词 汽油发动机 生命周期评价 能源消耗 环境影响 gasoline engine life cycle assessment energy consumption environmental impact
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1C ML. 2001. Handbook on Impact Categories CML2001[M]. Netherlands: Leiden University.
  • 2Finkbeiner M, Ruhland K, Cetiner H, et al.2002.Life cycle desigN-Methods, procedures and examples for the application of LCA in the automotive product development process[C].5th International Conference on ECOBALANCE. Japan.
  • 3Frischknecht R J N.2003. Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. Final report ecoinvent 2000[R].Duebendorf:Swiss Centre for LCI http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2002676452&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn.
  • 4ISO.2006. ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework[S].Geneva:International Organization for Standardization.
  • 5Jiang Q, Li T, Liu Z, et al. 2014. Life cycle assessment of an engine with input-output based hybrid analysis method[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 78: 131–138.
  • 6Li T, Liu Z, Zhang H, et al. 2013. Environmental emissions and energy consumptions assessment of a diesel engine from the life cycle perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 53: 7–12.
  • 7毛果平,朱有为,吴超.发动机制造与再制造过程的环境污染影响比较研究[J].汽车工程,2009,31(6):565-568. 被引量:8
  • 8MIIT.2013.关于开展工业产品生态设计的指导意见[Z].北京:工业和信息化部发展改革委环境保护部.
  • 9MIIT.2014.工业和信息化部关于组织开展工业产品生态设计示范企业创建工作的通知[Z].北京:工业和信息化部.
  • 10Shi J, Li T, Peng S, et al. 2015. Comparative life cycle assessment of remanufactured liquefied natural gas and diesel engines in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101: 129–136.

二级参考文献7

共引文献7

同被引文献6

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部