期刊文献+

脂质体多柔比星与多柔比星治疗弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的比较研究 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较脂质体多柔比星(PLD)和多柔比星治疗弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的疗效及心脏毒性。方法本试验采用开放式、随机、对照的方法进行研究。将50例弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者随机分成A组(环磷酰胺、脂质体多柔比星、长春新碱、泼尼松治疗组)、B组(环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱、泼尼松治疗组);A组PLD剂量为40mg/m^2,其余环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松采用标准CHOP方案中的剂量。B组环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱、泼尼松采用标准CHOP方案中的剂量。均建议联合应用利妥昔单抗化疗。每2周期化疗后复查评价疗效;每周期评价血液学、肝肾毒性、心脏毒性等。结果入组病例中A组完成25例、B组完成25例。6~8个疗程后A组有效率84.0%,B组为76.0%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。中位随访24.2(0.9~40.5)个月,A组总生存率及无进展生存率分别为80.0%及72.0%,B组总生存率及无进展生存率分别为84.0%及68.0%。差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。化疗最常见的不良反应为脱发、手足综合征、血小板减少、粒细胞减少、贫血、肝功能损害、心脏毒性、胃肠道反应(恶心、呕吐与腹痛、腹泻)、乏力、口腔炎。手足综合征仅见于A组。B组的脱发、血小板减少、Ⅳ度粒细胞减少、贫血、肝功能损害、心脏毒性、恶心呕吐、口腔炎发生率大于A组,两组发生率的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B组乏力、腹痛腹泻的发生率高于A组,但是两组乏力、腹痛腹泻的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组神经毒性的发生率相近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与多柔比星相比,含脂质体多柔比星的类似CHOP方案能明显减轻化疗所致的脱发、心脏毒性、肝脏损害、血液学毒性、口腔炎,两组化疗所致的疗效相当。
出处 《海峡药学》 2016年第7期118-121,共4页 Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Chen WQ,Zhang SW,Zeng HM,et al.Report of cancer incidence and mortality in China 2010[J].China Cancer,2014,23(1):1-10.
  • 2Groves FD,Linet MS,Travis LB,et al.Cancer surveillance series:nonHodgkin's lymphoma incidence by histologic subtype in the United States from 1978 through 1995[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(15):1240-1251.
  • 3Barrett-Lee PJ,Dixon JM,Farrell C,et al.Expert opinion on the use of anthracyclines in patients with advanced breast cancer at cardiac risk[J].Ann Oncol,2009,20(5):816.
  • 4Northfelt DW,Dezube BJ,Thommes JA,et al.Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin versus doxorubicin,bleomycin,and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma:results of a randomized phaseⅢclinical trial[J].J Clin Oncol,1998,16(7):2445-2451.
  • 5O'Brien ME,Wigler N,Inbar M,et al.Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phaseⅢtrial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl(CAELYX/Doxil)versus conventional doxorubicin for firstline treatment of metastatic breast cancer[J].Ann Oncol,2004,15(3):440-449.
  • 6Forssen EA,Coulter DM,Proffitt RT.Selective in vivo localization of daunorubicin small unilamellar vesicles in solid tumors[J].Cancer Res,1992,52(12):3255-3261.
  • 7Theodoulou M,Hudis C.Cardiac profiles of liposomal anthracyclines:greater cardiac safety versus conventional doxorubicin[J].Cancer,2004,100(10):2052-2063.
  • 8李蔚范 钱和年.联合化疗的心脏毒性.中华肿瘤杂志,1995,:170-170.
  • 9Levine MN,Bramwell VH,Pritchard KI,et al.Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide,epirubicin,and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide,methotrexate,and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,1998,16(8):2651-2658.
  • 10覃玉桃,钟进才.阿霉素心肌病及其检测[J].临床荟萃,2000,15(24):1138-1139. 被引量:13

二级参考文献44

  • 1李玉升,储大同.癌治疗出现的心脏问题[J].实用肿瘤杂志,1995,10(3):188-189. 被引量:8
  • 2李素英,刘运德.阿霉素的心脏毒副作用及其防治[J].心血管病学进展,1995,16(1):38-39. 被引量:3
  • 3Groves FD, Linet MS, Travis LB, et al. Cancer surveillance series: non- Hodgkin's lymphoma incidence by histologic subtype in the United States from 1978 through 1995[J].J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92(15) :1240-1251.
  • 4Bonadonna G, Bonfante V, Viviani S, et al. ABVD plus subtotal nodal versus involved-field radiotherapy in early-stage Hodg- kin's disease: long-term results[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(14): 2835--2841.
  • 5Advani RH, Hoppe RT, Baer D, et al. Efficacy of abbreviated Stan- ford V chemotherapy and involved- field radiotherapy in early- stage Hodgkin lymphoma: mature results of the G4 trial[J]. Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(4):1044-1048.
  • 6Duggan DB, Petroni GR, Johnson JL, et al. Randomized compari- son of ABVD and MOPP/ABV hybrid for the treatment of ad- vanced Hodgkin's disease: report of an intergroup trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21 (4):607--614.
  • 7Johnson PW, Radford JA, CuUen MH, et al. Comparison of AB- VD and alternating or hybrid multidrug regimens for the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of the United Kingdom Lymphoma Group LY09 Trial(ISRCTN97144519) [J]. j Grin O ncol, 2005, 23(36):9208-9218.
  • 8Bartlett NL, Niedzwiecki D, JohnsonJL, et al. Gemcitabine, vinorel- bine, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (GVD), a salvage regi- men in relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma: CALGB 598040]. Ann On- col, 2007, 18(6):1071-1079.
  • 9Coiffier B, Thieblemont C, Van Den Neste E, et al. Long-term out-come of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Grouped'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte[J]. Blood, 2010, 116(12):2040-2045.
  • 10Escal6n MP1, Liu NS, Yang Y, et al. Prognostic factors and treat- ment of patients with T- cell non- Hodgkin lymphoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experienceD]. Cancer, 2005, 103(10): 2091-2098.

共引文献46

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部