破产管理人监管过程中的阻却因素与现实进路

Bankruptcy Administrator Deterrent Factors in Process of Regulation and Realistic Approach

我国《企业破产法》规定债权人会议和债权人委员会对破产管理人进行监督,但两大监管主体事实上的虚置化导致监管缺位,加之配套法条笼统,且缺少相应的责任追究机制,使破产管理人的权利行使难以制约。对破产管理人的监管一直是我国破产法的薄弱环节,域外国家对破产管理人在准入门槛、监管措施、监督主体、违法责任及相应担保等方面均有细致的规定。我国的破产管理人监管机制可借鉴域外法治经验,在事前预防、过程监督和事后归责惩处方面进行革新,实现对破产管理人的有效监督。

Chinese enterprise bankruptcy law stipulates the creditors＇ meeting and the creditors＇ committee to supervise insolvency administrator, but both of the false regulatory agencies lead to the absence of regulation, combined with the ambiguous matching laws, and the lack of corresponding responsibility mechanism. The exercising rights of bankruptcy administrator are difficult to control. Supervision of bankruptcy administrator has always been the weak link of Chinese bankruptcy law. Bankruptcy administrators of foreign countries have detailed provisions in access threshold, regulatory measures, supervising subject, illegal responsibility and the corresponding guarantee, etc. Chinese administrators＇ supervision mechanism can use their experiences for reference, innovate beforehand prevention, supervision and afterwards imputation punishment, to realize the effective supervision of insolvency administrator.