期刊文献+

LAP+CD4+Treg细胞在结直肠癌患者外周血中的分布及意义

Distributions and significance of LAP + CD4 + Treg cells in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨LAP+CD4+Treg细胞在结直肠癌患者外周血中的分布及其与患者临床病理因素的关系。方法采用回顾性病例对照研究方法。收集2014年4—10月广西医科大学附属第一医院收治的40例行结直肠癌根治术患者和同期20例健康志愿者的临床资料。采用流式细胞仪检测外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例。观察指标:(1)结直肠癌患者及健康志愿者外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例。(2)结直肠癌患者临床病理因素与外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例的关系。(3)对与结直肠癌患者外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例相关的临床病理因素进行进一步定量相关性分析。正态分布的计量资料以z±S表示,组间比较采用t检验。采用Pearson检验进行相关性分析。结果(1)流式细胞仪检测外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例情况:结直肠癌患者外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例为9.4%±2.9%,健康志愿者为1.5%±0.7%,两者比较,差异有统计学意义(i=12.275,P〈0.05)。(2)结直肠癌患者临床病理因素与外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例的关系:血清CEA〈5.0μg/L的结直肠癌患者外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例为8.5%±3.2%,≥5.0μg/L患者为12.3%±3.0%;Dukes分期为A~B期患者为8.1%±1.1%,C~D期患者为10.8%±2.0%;有淋巴结转移的患者为11.4%±2.0%,无淋巴结转移的患者为9.3%±2.1%。不同血清CEA、Dukes分期、淋巴结转移的结直肠癌患者外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.783,-5.376,3.276,P〈0.05)。(3)相关性分析:结直肠癌患者血清CEA与外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例呈正相关,差异有统计学意义(r=0.543,P〈0.05)。结论LAP+CD4+Treg细胞在结直肠癌患者外周血中比例增加,且不同血清CEA、Dukes分期和淋巴结转移患者,外周血LAP+CD4+reg细胞比例不同。患者血清CEA与外周血LAP+CD4+Treg细胞比例呈正相关。 Objective To explore the distributions of LAP+ CD4 + Treg cells in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer and its relationship with the clinicopathological factors. Methods The retrospective case-control study was adopted. The clinical data of 40 patients undergoing radical resection of colorectal cancer and 20 healthy volunteers who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University between April 2014 and October 2014 were collected. The proportion of LAP+ CD4 + Treg cells in the peripheral blood was detected by flow cytometry. Analysis indicators included : ( 1 ) proportion of LAP+ CD4 + Treg cells in the peripheral blood between patients with colorectal cancer and healthy volunteers, (2) relationship between clinieopathologieal factors and proportion of LAP+ CD4+ Treg cells in the peripheral blood, (3) correlation analysis of quantitative data on the clinicopathologieal factors related with proportion of LAP + CD4 + Treg cells in the peripheral blood. Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as x ±s, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Correlation analysis was done using the Pearson test. Results ( 1 ) Results of flow cytometry showed that proportion of LAP + CD4 + Treg cells in the peripheral blood was 9.4% + 2.9% in patients with colorectal cancer and 1.5% ±0.7% in healthy volunteers, with a statistically significant difference ( t = 12. 275, P 〈 0.05). (2) Relationship between clinicopathological factors and proportion of LAP + CD4 +Treg cells in the peripheral blood : proportion of LAP +CD4 +Treg cells in the peripheral blood in patients with colorectal cancer was 8.5% ± 3.2% with serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) 〈 5.0 μg/L, 12.3% ± 3.0% with serum CEA≥5.0 p.g/L, 8.1%+1.1% in stage A-B of Dukes staging, 10.8%+2.0% in stage C-D of Dukes staging, 11.4%±2.0% with lymph nodes metastasis and 9.3%+2.1% without lymph nodes metastasis, showing statistically significant differences in the different levels of CEA, Dukes staging and lymph node metastasis ( t = 2. 783, - 5. 376, 3. 276, P 〈 0.05 ). ( 3 ) Correlation analysis : there was a positive correlation between serum CEA of patients with colorectal cancer and proportion of LAP+ CD4 + Treg cells in the peripheral blood, with a statistically significant difference (r = 0. 543, P 〈 0.05). Conclusions The proportion of LAP+ CD4 + Treg cells in the peripheral blood of patients with colorectal cancer is increased, and it is also different among patients with different Dukes staging and lymph node metastasis. There is a positive correlation between serum CEA of patients with colorectal cancer and proportion of LAP+ CD4 + Treg cells in the peripheral blood.
出处 《中华消化外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期820-824,共5页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金(81250316)
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 LAP+CD4+Treg细胞 流式细胞术 Colorectal neoplasms LAP + CD4+ Treg cells Flow cytometer
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics,2014[J]. Cancer J Clin,2014,64( 1 ) :9-29. DOI: 10. 3322/caac. 21208.
  • 2陈万青,张思维,曾红梅,郑荣寿,邹小农,赵平,吴良有,李光琳,赫捷.中国2010年恶性肿瘤发病与死亡[J].中国肿瘤,2014,23(1):1-10. 被引量:882
  • 3Gai XD, Song Y, Li C, et al. Potential role of plasmacytoid den- dritic cells for FOXP3 + regulatory T cell development in human colorectal cancer and tumor draining lymph node[ J]. Pathol Res Pract,2013,209( 12 ) :774-778. DOI: 10. 1016/j. prp. 2013.08. 011.
  • 4Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, et al. Clinical impact of different classes of infihrating T cytotoxic and helper cells ( Thl, th2, treg, th17) in patients with colorectal cancer[ J]. Cancer Res,2011,71 ( 4 ) : 1263-1271. DOI : 10. 1158/0008- 5472. CAN - 10 - 2907.
  • 5Gandhi R, Farez MF, Wang Y, et al. Cutting edge : human laten- cy-associated peptide + T cells: a novel regulatory T cell subset [J]. J Immunol,2010,184(9) :4620-4624. DOI: 10. 4049/jim- munol. 0903329.
  • 6Mullen L, Rigby A, Sclanders M, et al. Latency can be conferred to a variety of cytokines by fusion with latency-associated peptlde from TGF-β[ J]. Expert Opin Drug Deliv,2014, 11 ( 1 ) :5-16. DOI: 10. 1517/17425247. 2013. 839655.
  • 7Zhong Y, Wang X, Ji Q, et al. CD4 + LAP + and CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + regulatory T cells induced by nasal oxidized low-density lipoprotein suppress effector T cellsresponse and attenuate athero-sclerosis in ApoE-/- mice [ J ]. J Clin Immunol, 2012,32 ( 5 ) : 1104-1117. DOI : 10. 1007/s10875-012-9699-7.
  • 8Byrne WL, Mills KH, Lederer JA, et al. Targeting regulatory T cells in cancer[ J]. Cancer Res,2011,71 (22) :6915-6920. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472. CAN- 11-1156.
  • 9Roychoudhuri R, Eil RL, Restifo NP. The interplay of effector and regulatory T cells in cancer [ J]. Curr Opin Immunol,2015, 33:101-111. DOI:10. 1016/j. coi. 2015.02.003.
  • 10Volonte A, Di Tomaso T, Spinelli M, et al. Cancer-initiating cells from colorectal cancer patients escape from T cell-mediated immu- nosurveillance in vitro through membrane-bound IL-4 [ J]. J Immunol, 2014, 192 ( 1 ) : 523-532. DOI: 10. 4049/jimmunol. 1301342.

二级参考文献25

  • 1Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics,2013 [ J]. CA Cancer J Clin ,2013,63 ( 1 ) : 11-30.
  • 2Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al, Cancer statistics(2009) [J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2009,59(4) :225-249.
  • 3Mella J, Biffin A, Radcliffe AG, et al. Population-based audit of coloreetal cancer management in two UK health regions. Coloreetal Cancer Working Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England Clinical Epidemiology and Audit Unit [ J ]. Br J Surg, 1997,84 ( 12 ) : 1731-1736.
  • 4Choi HJ, Shin JY. Colorectal cancer with multiple metastases: is palliative surgery needed? [J]. J Korean Soc Coloproctol,2011, 27 (5) :226-230.
  • 5Costi R, Mazzeo A, Di Mauro D, et al. Palliative resection of colorectal cancer: does it prolong survival? [ J]. Ann Surg Onco1,2007,14 ( 9 ) :2567-2576.
  • 6Anwar S, Peter MB, Dent J, et al. Palliative excisional surgery for primary colorectal cancer in patients with incurable metastatic disease. Is there a survival benefit? A systematic review [J]. Colorectal Dis,2012,14(8) :920-930.
  • 7Costi R, Di Manro D, Veronesi L, et al. Elective palliative resec- tion of incurable stage IV eoloreetal cancer: who really benefits from it? [J]. Surg Today,2011,41(2) :222-229.
  • 8Park JH, Kim TY, Lee KH, et al. The beneficial effect of pallia- tive resection in metastatic colorectal cancer [ J ]. Br J Cancer, 2013,108(7) :1425-1431.
  • 9Siegel R, Dcsantis C, Jemal A. Clolrectal cancer statistics, 2014 [J]. CA Cancer J Chn,2014,64(2) :104-117.
  • 10Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics,2014[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2014,64( 1 ) :9-29.

共引文献891

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部