期刊文献+

论[许可]和[免除]的两种隐涵义 被引量:2

Two Kinds of Implicature of Permissive and Exempt
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在足量原则作用下,字面义表示[许可]的情态结构可以隐涵[非必要],表示[免除]的情态结构可以隐涵[非禁止],这两种隐涵义对语境的依赖较小。在不过量原则的作用下,[许可]可以隐涵[必要],[免除]可以隐涵[禁止],这两种隐涵义对语境的依赖较大,只有在面子威胁语境中才能被激活。根据礼貌原则,如果话语有可能威胁到听话人的面子,说话人倾向于使用信息量较小的表达方式。这种现象不但存在于道义情态范畴,也存在于其他具有信息量等级性的范畴中。 According to Q1 principle the structures which literal meanings are "permissive" can get implicature "not necessary", and "exempt" can get implicature "not forbidden". According to Q2 principle the structures which literal meanings are "permissive" can get implicature "necessary", and "exempt" can get implicature "forbidden". The former is quite context- independent while the latter is context-dependent and only exists in face-threatening context. When the utterance may threaten hearer's face, speakers usually express small amounts of information according to politeness principle. These phenomen exist in modality and other categoris which members have different amount of information.
作者 林刘巍
出处 《汉语学习》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期34-40,共7页 Chinese Language Learning
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目"汉语及其方言情态的句法语义研究"(项目编号:14AYY017) 国家社会科学基金青年项目"面向计算的现代汉语动词的叙实性研究"(项目编号:15CYY035) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"汉语情态的历时研究"(项目编号:15JJD740013)资助
关键词 道义情态 许可 免除 隐涵义 deontic modality permissive exempt implicature
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1贝罗贝,李明.语义演变理论与语义演变和句法演变研究[A].当代语言学理论和汉语研究(沈阳冯胜利主编)[C].北京:商务印书馆,2008.
  • 2姜望琪.语用推理之我见[J].现代外语,2014,37(3):293-302. 被引量:25
  • 3沈家煊.语用原则、语用推理和语义演变[J].外语教学与研究,2004,36(4):243-251. 被引量:305
  • 4Bonnefon, J.F. & G. Villejoubert. Communicating Likelihood and Managing Face: Can We Say it is Probable When We Know it to be Certain? [A] .In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou & M. Buciarelli (eds.). Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society [C] .NJ: Erlbaum, 2005.
  • 5Bonnefon, J. F. & G. Villejoubert. Tactful or Doubtful? Expectations of Politeness Explain the Severity Bias in the Interpretation of Probability Phrases [J] .Psychological Science, 2006, (17).
  • 6Bonnefon,J. F., A. Feeney & G. Villejoubert. When Some is Actually all: Scalar Inferences in Face-threatening Contexts [J] .Cognition, 2009, (112).
  • 7Brown, E & S. Levinson. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage[M] .Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  • 8Griee, H. E Logic and Conversation [A] .In Cole, E and Morgan (eels.). Syntax and Semantics, (Vol. 3) Speech Acts[C] .New York: New York Academic Press, 1975.
  • 9Horn, L. R. Towards a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature [A] .in D. Schiffrin (ed.). Meaning, Form, and Use in Context[C] .Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1984.
  • 10Lakoff, R. The Logic of Politeness [A].In Claudia Corum, T.C. Smith-Stark, & A. Weiser (eds.) Papers form the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society[C] .Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1973.

二级参考文献84

  • 1沈家煊.实词虚化的机制──《演化而来的语法》评介[J].当代语言学,1998(3):41-46. 被引量:498
  • 2沈家煊.“语法化”研究综观[J].外语教学与研究,1994,26(4):17-24. 被引量:1156
  • 3沈家煊.语言的“主观性”和“主观化”[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(4):268-275. 被引量:2297
  • 4徐盛桓.基于模型的语用推理[J].外国语,2007,30(3):2-9. 被引量:134
  • 5索绪尔 高名凯译.普通语言学教程[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.101-102.
  • 6沈家煊.说“不过”,提交“纪念吕叔湘先生诞辰100周年学术研讨会”(北京)论文[Z].,2004..
  • 7Brown, P & S C. Levinson. 1987[1978]. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage [ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Bybee, J ,R Perkins & W Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar : Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the Worm [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 9Geis, M L & A M Zwicky. 1971. On invited inferences [J]. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 561-566.
  • 10Grice, 1975. Logic and conversation [A]. In P Cole,& J Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts [C]. New York: Academic Press.

共引文献328

同被引文献58

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部