刘敞《春秋》学之经与史、经与传关系

The Correlation between the Confucianism and Historiography, the Text and Commentaries of Liu Chang's The Spring And Autumn Annals Studies

《春秋》学在北宋时期为显学。刘敞是北宋《春秋》学重要代表人物,著有《七经小传》、《春秋》五书。刘敞主张《春秋》为经非史,但史为基础;批判《春秋》传与注,但对传和注采取了不同态度,而评判的标准是《春秋》经文本,尊经信义。刘敞成为宋初庆历之际开经学新风的学者之一。

The Spring and Autumn Annals has become prominent subject in Song Dynasty. Liu Chang was. an important representative in the Study of the Spring and Autumn Annals. His works included Seven after biographies and five books explained the Spring and Autumn Annals; Liu Chang thought the Spring and Autumn Annals was Confucian classics instead of history books, but it based on history; He criticized the Spring and Autumn commentaries notes, but took a different attitude about the records and the annotation of the Spring and Autumn Annals, which judgment standard was classical text of the Spring and Autumn Annals. So Liu Chang respected classic formulae and the implications. Liu Chang became one of the scholars led to new academic trend of the Confucian classics studies in the Qingli periods of the early song dynasty.