摘要
有清一代,考据是其学术标签。《管子》是明清以来学以致用的读本。通观清代考据学者研究《管子》的文献,并结合有清一代的学术环境来分析,不难发现考据学者研究《管子》的一些共性:由于文字高压而去政治化,但又试图表达经世致用;由于以子证经而形成札记体,但又因考据而泥于考据等等。分析考据学家对《管子》的研究特征可以感知清代学者的学术取向。
The textology was an academic label in the Qing dynasty. Guanzi was a textbook which was put it practical use since the Ming and Qing dynasties. By studying the documents of Guanzi throughout the Qing textology and combining with academic environment to analysis of the Qing dynasty, it is not difficult to find some common characteristics gained by textology researchers. They were depoliticized by high-pressure cultural policy,but they tried to express the idea of practical utility; they proved Confucian classics with zhuzi and formed Liji;they also used the methods of textology research but localized by it. It's possible to have perception of the Qing dynasty scholars' academic orientation by textology.
出处
《沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
2016年第4期112-115,共4页
Journal of Shenyang Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
清代
管子
考据
表征
Qing dynasty
Guanzi
textology
characterization