期刊文献+

清代考据学视阈下的《管子》研究表征

Characterization of Guanzi from the Perspective of Textology in Qing Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有清一代,考据是其学术标签。《管子》是明清以来学以致用的读本。通观清代考据学者研究《管子》的文献,并结合有清一代的学术环境来分析,不难发现考据学者研究《管子》的一些共性:由于文字高压而去政治化,但又试图表达经世致用;由于以子证经而形成札记体,但又因考据而泥于考据等等。分析考据学家对《管子》的研究特征可以感知清代学者的学术取向。 The textology was an academic label in the Qing dynasty. Guanzi was a textbook which was put it practical use since the Ming and Qing dynasties. By studying the documents of Guanzi throughout the Qing textology and combining with academic environment to analysis of the Qing dynasty, it is not difficult to find some common characteristics gained by textology researchers. They were depoliticized by high-pressure cultural policy,but they tried to express the idea of practical utility; they proved Confucian classics with zhuzi and formed Liji;they also used the methods of textology research but localized by it. It's possible to have perception of the Qing dynasty scholars' academic orientation by textology.
作者 郝继东
出处 《沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第4期112-115,共4页 Journal of Shenyang Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 清代 管子 考据 表征 Qing dynasty Guanzi textology characterization
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献63

  • 1辞海编委会.辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1989..
  • 2康有为.长兴学记[M].陈汉才,校注.广州:广东高等教育出版社,1991:48.
  • 3河南程氏遗书:卷4[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
  • 4河南程氏粹言:卷1[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
  • 5朱熹.建宁府建阳县学藏书记[M]∥朱熹集:卷78.成都:四川教育出版社,1996.
  • 6宋史·卷434·陆九渊传[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
  • 7戴望.颜氏学记:卷1[M].北京:中华书局,1958.
  • 8章学诚.文史通义·卷3·朱陆[M].北京:中华书局,1994.
  • 9朱子语类:卷14[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1997.
  • 10汉书·卷56·董仲舒传[M].北京:中华书局,1962.

共引文献261

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部