期刊文献+

森林采伐限额管理制度能否起到保护森林资源的作用 被引量:40

Can the forest logging quota management system protect forest resources?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 森林采伐限额管理制度已在我国实行30余年,其能否实现森林资源的永续增长是一个悬而未决且具有重要意义的理论命题。为此,本文在对森林采伐限额管理制度进行制度变迁分析的基础上,以其在1991年和2001年的制度改革为自然实验依据,通过精确断点回归模型估计出森林采伐限额管理制度变迁各阶段对森林资源的保护作用。研究结果表明:新中国成立以后我国森林采伐管制经历了"无管制"、"全面管制"、"分类管制"等三个阶段,政府管制强度总体呈现递增趋势。断点回归结果显示森林采伐限额管理制度的全面实施以及2001年的分类管制改革对有林地面积和森林蓄积量的影响均不显著,可见,1991年森林采伐限额管理制度在全国层面实施并没能起到保护森林资源的作用,2001年后国家加大采伐管制力度,即在加强公益林采伐管制的前提下,不断增加公益林区划面积的做法可能会造成森林资源遭受更严重的破坏。究其原因,主要是森林经营者在生存压力或经济激励下可采取"滥砍滥伐"或"俘获"政府等方式突破现有管制,政府一味的加大管制力度反而会进一步刺激森林经营者"超额"采伐行为。本文同时发现,自1991年以来我国有林地面积、活立木蓄积量大幅度的增加主要归功于重点工程造林项目在全国层面的实施。基于此,认为国家应在限额总量不变的前提下,弱化政府对采伐许可等管理制度的管制力度,并大力发展林区替代产业,降低森林经营者的山林依赖度,以期从本源上解决森林采伐限额管理制度失灵问题。 The Forest Logging Quota Management System (FLQMS) has been implemented for more than 30 years in China. Whether it can achieve the sustainable growth of forest resources is an open and significant theoretical proposition. Therefore, after analyzing FLQMS institutional change,this paper treated the 1991 and 2001 institutional reform of the FLQMS as a natural experiment and estimated the effect of the institutional change on the forest resources through using accurate hreakpoints regression model. The forest logging regulation has experienced three stages of ' no regulation' , ' comprehensive regulation' and ' classification regulation' from foundation of new China, which means the regulation intensify is stronger and stronger in general. The RD results show that the comprehensive implementation of FLQMS in 1991 and classification regulation in 2001 have insignificant influence on forestland area and forest volume. So, the nationwide implementation of FLQMS in 1999 failed to protect forest resources, and classification regulation after 2001, which means the increase of area of public welfare forests under the circumstances of strengthening the regulation on public welfare forest, may lead to more serious damage to forest resources. This is mainly because the forest operators can break through the existing control by ' illegal logging' or ' regulation capture' under the pressure of surviving and motivation of interests, and the regulation intensity strengthened by government blindly would further stimulate forest operators'‘ excess' logging. It also finds that the sharp increase of forestland area and stocking volume in China is mainly due to the implementation of key engineering afforestation project after 1991. So, we think that the government should weaken regulation intensity of the logging management system, and reduce the dependence of forest operators on mountain forest by developing alternative industry in forest zone, in order to solve the regulation faihtre of FLQMS.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期128-136,共9页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"集体林权制度改革跟踪研究"(批准号:10AJY006) 江苏省社会科学基金项目"生态权的理论内涵与制度构建"(批准号:14FXD004) 清华大学清华农村研究博士论文奖学金项目"森林采伐限额管理制度效率分析:基于制度变迁及制度构成视角"(批准号:2015033)
关键词 采伐管理制度 采伐限额制度 森林资源 管制强度 断点回归 logging management system logging quota system forest resources regulation intensity regression discontinuity
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1WANG S, KOOTEN G, BILL W. Forest policy in post-1978 China [J]. Forest policy and economics, 2004 (6) :73 -80.
  • 2LIU D. Tenure and management of non-state forests in China since 1950: A historical review [J]. Environmental hi~tory, 2001, 6(2) :239 -263.
  • 3XU J T. Harvesting quota in China [M]//XU J T. ULRICH S. International forum on chinese forest policy. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2002.
  • 4田淑英.集体林权改革后的森林资源管制政策研究[J].农业经济问题,2010,31(1):90-95. 被引量:22
  • 5TIANShuylng.Researchonforestresourcesregulatory policy after the reform of collective forest rig~hts [ J ]. Issues in agricultural economy,2010 ( 1 ) :90 -95.
  • 6XU J T, TAO R, AMACHER G S. An empirical analysis of China's state-owned forests I ..l 1. Forest policy and economics, 2004 ( 6 ) : 379 - 390.
  • 7JIANG X M, GONG P C, BOSTEDT G, et al. Impacts of policy measures on the development of state-owned forests in Northeast China: theoretical results and empirical evidence [ J ]. Environment and develoomem economics. 2014. 19 (1 "~ ~74-91.
  • 8张英,宋维明.林权制度改革对集体林区森林资源的影响研究[J].农业技术经济,2012(4):96-104. 被引量:31
  • 9ZHANGYing,SONGWeiming.Research on influence of forest right system reform on forest resources in collective forest areaIJ]. Journal of agre technical economics,2012 (4) : 96-104.
  • 10ELLIS E A. PORTER-BOLLAND L. Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? a comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighboring study areas of the central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico [Jl. Forest ecology and management, 2008, 256:971 - 1983.

二级参考文献15

共引文献45

同被引文献444

引证文献40

二级引证文献225

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部