摘要
在避雨环境下进行土壤水势渐进式下降处理,研究了苹果树体水分状态指标对土壤干旱胁迫响应的敏感性,分析了不同水分状态指标与树体水分平衡之间的关系.结果表明:树干直径日较差(MDS)及中午树干水势(Ψstem)对干旱胁迫最敏感.MDS对参考蒸散(ET_0)有明显的响应,且对干旱胁迫比较敏感,与ET_0呈显著正相关,相对树干直径日较差(MDSr)与相对土壤水势(Ψ_(r soil))呈显著负相关,树干直径可实现连续性测量及自动化记录.Ψstem对土壤干旱胁迫较敏感,且与ET_0呈显著负相关,相对中午树干水势(Ψ_(r stem))与Ψ_(r soil)呈显著相关,目前叶水势和树干水势难以实现自动化连续性观测.其他树体水分状态指标,如黎明前叶水势(Ψ_(pd))、树干直径日生长量(DG)和气孔导度(g_s)等对中度或重度干旱胁迫也有不同程度的响应,但总体上对土壤水势变化的响应不敏感.
The main tree water status indicators which sensitively responded to drought stress and related to tree water balance were investigated in treatment of progressive decrease of soil water potential under shelter from rain. The results showed that stem maximum daily shrinkage( MDS) and midday stem water potential( Ψstem) were most sensitive to drought stress among all the water status indicators. MDS not only significantly responded to reference crop evapotranspiration( ET_0),but also was sensitive to soil drought stress. MDS was significantly positively related to ET_0,and the correlation between relative stem daily maximum shrinkage( MDSr) and relative soil water potential( Ψ_(r soil)) was highly significant. Moreover,the stems could be measured in succession and recorded automatically. Midday Ψstemwas also sensitive to soil drought stress,and significantly negatively related to ET_0. The correlation between relative midday stem potential( Ψ_(r stem)) and Ψ_(r soil)was significant. But so far,it is difficult to automatically measure either leaf or stem water potential. Predawn leaf water potential( Ψ_(pd)),daily stem growth( DG) or stomatal conductance( gs) also responded to drought stress to some extent under moderate or heavy drought stress,but they were not sensitive.
出处
《应用生态学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第8期2459-2466,共8页
Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金
农业部现代苹果产业技术体系建设专项资金项目(CARS-28)
国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD32B03-02)
公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201206023-03)资助~~
关键词
苹果树
干旱胁迫
水分状态指标
apple tree
drought stress
water status indicator