期刊文献+

损伤控制性肋骨接骨板手术在创伤性连枷胸中的应用价值 被引量:5

Values of embracing fixator for damage-control surgery in the management of traumatic flail chest
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨损伤控制性手术在创伤性连枷胸中的应用价值。方法收集2015年5月—2016年4月收集余姚市人民医院创伤性连枷胸患者60例,采用随机数字表法,将患者分为实验组(30例)和对照组(30例),其中实验组采用损伤控制性肋骨接骨板治疗,对照组采用肋骨固定带固定。主要观察指标为临床干预指标、主要并发症和临床预后。结果与对照组比较,实验组患者镇痛药物使用时间显著缩短[(2.41±1.43)d vs.(4.21±2.61)d,P=0.012];抗生素使用时间显著缩短[(3.24±2.93)d vs.(6.32±2.43)d,P=0.008];术后机械通气时间明显缩短[(2.82±0.79)d vs.(5.21±1.33)d,P=0.028];肺不张发生率显著减少(3.33%vs.23.33%,P=0.023);住院时间显著缩短[(18.32±7.43)d vs.(26.43±11.93)d,P=0.002]。2组患者机械通气率、胸腔闭式引流率、胸腔闭式引流时间、肺部感染率和急性呼吸窘迫综合症等差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究期间,无患者死亡。结论损伤控制性肋骨接骨板手术显著改善创伤性连枷胸患者临床预后并缩短了患者的整体住院时间。 Objective To investigate the values of embracing fixator for damage-control surgery in the management of traumatic flail chest. Methods Sixty patients with traumatic flail chest were enrolled in this prospectively study. According to the principle of completely random digital table, all patients were randomly signed into experiment group (n = 30 ) or control group( n = 30). Damage control surgery with embracing fixator was adopted in experiment group, while fixed rib fixation was adopted in the control group. The primary outcomes were clinical interventions, major complications and clinical outcomes. Results When compared with the control group, patients in the experiment group got a significantly shorter analgesic drug use time [ ( 2.41 ± 1.43 ) d vs. ( 4.21 ± 2.61 ) d, P = 0.012 ] ; a significantly shorter antibiotic use duration[ (3.24 ± 2.93 ) d vs. (6.32 ± 2.43 ) d, P = 0. 008 )] ;a significantly shorter mechanical ventilation duration [ (2.82 ± 0.79) d vs. (5.21 ± 1.33 ) d, P = 0. 028 ] ; a significantly lower rate of pulmonary atelectasis (3.33% vs. 23.33% ,P = 0. 023 ) ;and a significantly shorter hospital duration [ ( 18.32 ± 7.43 ) d vs. ( 26.43 ± 11.93 ) d, P = 0. 002 ]. There was no difference between the two groups in mechanical ventilation, closed drainage of thoracic cavity, closed drainage of thoracic cavity duration, lung infection and acute respiratory distress syndrome (P 〉 0.05 ). None patients died during the study period. Conclusion The embracing fixator for damage control surgery in the management of traumatic flail chest improves the clinical outcomes and hospital duration.
出处 《中华全科医学》 2016年第10期1657-1659,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
基金 2013年浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2013KYA-191)
关键词 创伤性连枷胸 损伤控制性手术 肋骨接骨板 临床预后 Traumatic flail chest Damage-control surgery Rib embracing fixator Clinical outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Langdorf MI, Medak AJ, Hendey GW, et al. Prevalence and Clinical Import of Thoracic Injury Identified by Chest Computed Tomography but Not Chest Radiography in Blunt Trauma: Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study[ J]. Ann Emerg Med,2015,66(6) :589-600.
  • 2Matsumoto S, Sekine K, Funabiki T, et al. Chest tube insertion direc- tion : is it always necessary to insert a chest tube posteriorly in primary trauma care? [J]. Am J Emerg Med,2015,33( 1 ) :88-91.
  • 3Evman S,Kolbas I,Dogruyol T,et al. A Case of Traumatic Flail Chest Requiring Stabilization with Surgical Reconstruction [ J ]. Thorac Card- iovasc Surg Rep,2015,4( 1 ) :8-10.
  • 4Leenstra BS, Stolwijk A, Poeze M. Surgical stabilisation in a 13-year- old boy with traumatic flail chest[ J]. BMJ Case Rep,2015,20 (14) : 123-129.
  • 5Kulaylat AN, Chesnut CH, Santos AP, et al. Successful operative rib fixation of traumatic flail chest in a patient with osteogenesis imperfec- ta[ J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2014,19 ( 3 ) :518-519.
  • 6Maraseo SF, Davies AR, Cooper J, et al. Prospective randomized con- trolled trial of operative rib fixation in traumatic flail chest [ J ]. J Am Coil Surg,2013,216 ( 5 ) :924-932.
  • 7王长涛,王盛章,王伟中,许咏冬,王冬冬,李智成,熊健.四爪接骨板内固定治疗多发性肋骨骨折和连枷胸的有限元建模和临床分析[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2013,20(5):551-554. 被引量:8
  • 8王继华,张建,樊建坤.肋骨内固定联合机械通气治疗创伤性连枷胸合并肺挫伤[J].河北医药,2014,36(3):361-363. 被引量:16
  • 9O' Connor JV, DuBose JJ, Scalea TM. Damage-control thoracic surger- y: Management and outcomes [ J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2014, 77(5) :660-665.
  • 10Tong DC, Breeze J. Damage control surgery and combat-related maxil- lofacial and cervical injuries: a systematic review[ J ]. Br J Oral Max- illofac Surg,2016,54( 1 ) :8-12.

二级参考文献85

共引文献184

同被引文献42

引证文献5

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部