期刊文献+

超声联合弹性成像技术评价2型糖尿病患者跖筋膜异常改变的应用价值 被引量:2

Abnormal changes in plantar fascia of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus evaluated by ultrasonography combined with elastosonography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声联合弹性成像技术评价2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者足底跖筋膜异常改变的临床应用价值。方法 65例T2DM患者根据其糖尿病病程分为≤10年34例(A组)和〉10年31例(B组),另选同期健康志愿者38例为对照组。应用高频超声观察各组跖筋膜的内部回声和边界,同时测量跖筋膜距离跟骨结节止点1 cm(PF1)及2 cm(PF2)处的厚度。以PF1、PF2点为中点,长约1 cm的矩形区域为PF1区、PF2区,应用弹性成像技术将跖筋膜PF1区和PF2区的弹性分为1~3级,比较各组弹性分级频数。结果对照组跖筋膜纵切面呈细条状高回声,内可见均匀的平行线样条状高回声,与周围组织界限清晰。A组跖筋膜异常改变13例,B组24例,对照组5例,两两比较差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05);A、B组及对照组PF1厚度两两比较差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05);B组PF2厚度大于对照组(P〈0.05);A组PF2厚度与对照组和B组比较,差异均无统计学意义。PF1区弹性分级频数比较:1级弹性频数A、B组大于对照组,B组大于A组(均P〈0.05);2级、3级弹性频数A、B组小于对照组,B组小于A组(均P〈0.05)。PF2区弹性分级频数比较:1级、2级弹性频数A、B组较对照组增加,3级弹性频数减少,差异均无统计学意义。结论超声联合弹性成像技术能够发现T2DM患者足底跖筋膜的异常改变,对糖尿病足的早期预防和诊治具有重要意义。 Objective To explore the clinical value of ultrasonography combined with elastosonography in evaluating the abnormal changes in plantar fascia of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).Methods Sixty-five T2 DM patients were enrolled and divided into two groups, including group A(34 cases with course≤10 years)and group B(31 cases with course 〉10 years).Thirty-eight healthy subjects were enrolled as normal control. The echo texture and border of plantar fascia were observed by high-frequency ultrasonography. The thickness of plantar fascia was measured at its 1 cm and 2 cm distal from insertion locations(PF 1 and PF 2). The rectangle area with 1 cm length was divided into PF1 and PF2 areas with the midpoints of PF1 and PF2 points. The elasticity of plantar fascia in PF 1 and PF 2 areas was assessed by elastsonoography and classified as 1-3grades, then the grading frequency was compared.Results The ultrasound findings of longitudinal plane of plantar fascia in normal group was displayed as a thin homogeneous hyperechoic band with small parallel lines and well-defined border with surrounding tissue. The rates of abnormality change in group A(13 cases)and group B(24 cases)were higher than that in normal group(5 cases),and it was higher in group B compared that in group A(P〈0.05).The thickness of PF 1 in group A and B was larger than that in normal group,and it was larger in group B than group A(P〈0.05).The PF 2 thickness in group B was larger than that in normal group(P〈0.05).But there was no significant difference of PF 2 thickness between group A and normal group,group A and group B.The elasticity frequency of grade 1 was increased in group A and group B than that in normal group,and so was it in group B than that in group A(P〈0.05). And the frequencies of the grade 2 and grade 3 in group A and group B were decreased than those in normal group,and so was it in group B than that in group A(P〈0.05).There were no significant differences in the elasticity grading of PF 2 area among all the groups(P〈0.05).Conclusion The abnormal changes in the plantar fascia of T2 DM patients can be evaluated by ultrasonography combined with elastosonography. It has important clinical significance for the early prevention,diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot.
出处 《临床超声医学杂志》 2016年第7期452-455,共4页 Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine
关键词 超声检查 弹性成像 糖尿病 2型 跖筋膜 Ultrasonography Elastosonography Diabetes mellitus type 2 Plantar fascia
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Ieong E, Afolayan J, Came A, et al.Ultrasound scanning for recalcitrant plantar fasciopathy.Basis of a new classification [ J ].Skeletal radiology, 2013,42( 3 ) : 393-398.
  • 2Turan A,Tufan A, Mercan R,et al.Real-time sonoelastography of achilles tendon in patients with ankylosing spondylitis [J].Skeletal Radiology, 2013,42(8) : 1113-1118.
  • 3Rascual Huerta J, Alarcan Garcia JM.Effect of gender, age and anthropometric variables on plantar fascia thickness at different locations in asymptomatic subjects [ J ] .Eur J Radiol, 2007,62 ( 3 ) : 449-453.
  • 4Ozdemir H, Yilmaz E, Murat A, et al.Sonographic evaluation of plantar fasciitis and relation to body mass index[ J].Eur J Radial, 2005,54 (3): 443-447.
  • 5Park JW, Yoon K, Chun KS, et al.Long-term outcome of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis :comparative analysis according to uhrasonographic findings [ J l.Ann Rehabil Med, 2014,38(4) : 534-540.
  • 6Angin S, Crofts G, Mickle K J, et al.Ultrasound evaluation of foot muscles and plantar fascia in pes planus [ J ].Gait Posture, 2014,40 ( 1 ) : 48-52.
  • 7De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuohtner GM, et al.Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy achilles tendons [ J ].Am J Roentgenol, 2009,193 ( 2 ) : 134-138.
  • 8Stecco C, Corradin M, Macchi Y, et al.Plantar fascia anatomy and its relationship with Achilles tendon and paratenon [ J ].J Anatomy, 2013, 223 (6) : 665-676.
  • 9Mentink CJ,Hendriks M,Levels AA,et al.Glncose-mcdiated cross- linking of collagen in rat tendon and skin [ J ].Clin Chim Acta, 2002, 321 ( 1 ) : 69-76.
  • 10Bedi A, Fox AJ, Harris PE,et al.Diabetes mellitus impairs tendon- bone healing after rotator cuff repair[J ].J Shoulder Elbow Surgery, 2010,19(7) :978-988.

二级参考文献26

  • 1Riddle DL, Schappert SM. Volume of ambulatory care visits and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis: a national study of medical doctors[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2004, 25(5):303 - 310.
  • 2Roxas M. Plantar fasciitis: diagnosis and therapeutic considerations[J]. Altern Med Rev, 2005, 10:83-93.
  • 3Riddle DL, Pulisic M, Sparrow K. Impact of demo- graphic and impairment-related variables on disability associated with plantar fasciitis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2004,25 : 311-317.
  • 4Riddle DL, Pulisic M, Pidcoe P, et al. Risk factors for plantar fasciitis: a matched case-control study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85: 872-877.
  • 5Badlissi F, Dunn JE, Link CL, et al. Foot museulo- skeletal disorders, pain, and foot-related functional lim- itation in older persons[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2005, 53:1029-1033.
  • 6Irving DB, Cook JL, Young MA, et al. Obesity and pronated foot type may increase the risk of chronic plantar heel pain: a matched case-control study[J]. BMC Museuloskelet Disord, 2007,8 : 41.
  • 7Wearing SC, Smeathers JE, Urry SR, et al. The Path- omechanics of Plantar Faseiitis[J]. Sports Med ,2006, 36 (7): 585-611.
  • 8Johal KS, Milner SA. Plantar faseiitis and the calcaneal spur: Fact or fiction[J]? Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2012,18139 - 41.
  • 9Fabrikant JM, Park ST. Plantar fasciitis (fasciosis) treatment outcome study: Plantar fascia thickness measured by ultrasound and correlated with patient self-reported improvement[J]. The Foot , 2011, 21 : 79 - 83.
  • 10Donley BG, Moore T, Sferra J, et al. The efficacy of o- ral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication (NSAID) in the treatment of plantar faseiitis: A randomized, pro- spective, placebo-controlled study[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2007, 28 :20-23.

共引文献33

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部