双元领导对员工创新行为的影响机制研究被引量：31

Research of the Influence Mechanism of Ambidextrous Leadership on Employee Innovative Behavior

下载PDF

导出

摘要基于领导理论和创新理论,本研究旨在探究双元领导对员工创新行为的影响及其作用机制和边界条件。以16家高新技术企业中的281名R&D员工为调查对象,运用层级回归分析方法对概念模型进行统计检验。研究结果表明:双元领导对员工创新行为存在显著的正向影响,创新自我效能感与领导—成员交换(LMX)关系在其中起完全中介作用;认知灵活性在双元领导与创新自我效能感及LMX关系之间起增强调节作用。研究结论为领导者打破传统单一行为路径转而采用动态互补双元领导行为提升员工创新水平提供了新视角,并对企业创新管理有重要的实践意义。 Based on the theory of leadership and innovation, this research explores the impact of ambidextrous leadership on employee innovative behavior, and examines the mechanism and moderating effect. With a sample of 281 R＆D employees from 16 new and high-tech enterprises, this research conducts hierarchical regression to testify the conceptual model. The results show that： ambidextrous leadership has a significantly positive effect on employee innovative behavior as completely mediated by creative self-efficacy and LMX; cognitive flexibility positively moderates the relationship between ambidextrous leadership and creative self-efficacy, and also LMX. This research provides a new perspective for leader to use dynamical and complementary ambidextrous leadership instead of the traditional and single behavior process, and has important practical implications for innovation management.

作者罗瑾琏赵莉钟竞

机构地区同济大学经济与管理学院

出处《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期1-7,共7页 Forecasting

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(71472137 71202031 71472109 71302048) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大科技攻关资助项目(10JZD0045-2)

关键词双元领导创新自我效能感 LMX关系认知灵活性员工创新行为 ambidextrous leadership creative self-efficacy LMX relationship cognitive flexibility employee innovative behavior

分类号 C933.2 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献27

1Pieterse A N, Van Knipperberg D V, Schippers M, et al.. Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: the moderating role of psychological empowerment [ J ]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2010, 31 (4): 609-623.
2Zhang X M, Bartol K M. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsie motivation, and ereative process engagement [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(1) : 107-128.
3Zhang X M, Zhou J. Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: interaction effects and a mediating mechanism [ J ]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 2014, 124 (2) : 150-164.
4Miron E, Erez M, Naveh E. Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25 (2) : 175-199.
5Rosing K, Frese M, Bausch A. Explaining the heteroge- neity of the leadership-innovation relationship: ambidex- trous leadership [ J ]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2011, 22 ( 5 ) : 956-974.
6Zhang Y, Waldman D, Han Y L, et al.. Paradoxical leader behavior in people management: antecedents and consequences [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58(2) : 538-566.
7Zacher H, Rosing K.. Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation[ J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2015, 36(1): 54-68.
8陈建勋.组织学习的前因后果研究:基于二元视角[J].科研管理,2011,32(6):140-149. 被引量：35
9Smith W K, Tushman M L. Managing strategic contradic- tions: a top management model for managing innovation streams[ J ]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(5) : 522-536.
10Schreuders J, Legesse A. Organizational ambidexterity: how small technology firms balance innovation and support [ J ]. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2012, 2(2) : 17-21.