混合所有制企业高管团队断裂带对突破性创新绩效的影响:基于混合高管结构权力平衡的调节效应被引量：22

The Impact of TMT Faultline on the Breakthrough Innovations of Mixed Firms:The Moderation of Structural Power Equality Between State-owned and Non-state-owned TMT Members

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文基于中国上市电子信息类混合所有制企业的纵向数据,使用负二项式分布模型分析不同类型高管团队断裂带与企业突破性创新绩效间的关系,以及混合高管结构权力平衡的调节效应。研究发现:(1)任务断裂带与突破性创新绩效无显著相关;(2)情感断裂带与突破性创新绩效显著负相关;(3)混合高管结构权力平衡负向调节情感断裂带与突破性创新绩效间的关系。因此,混合所有制企业需积极增强混合高管结构权力平衡。 Using data of Chinese mixed and listed electronic and information companies and applying fixed-effects Nega- tive Binomial Model, this study analyzes the relationships between TMT faultline, structural power equality and perform- ance of breakthrough innovations. The results indicate that, first, there is not significant effects of task-related TMT faultline on performance of breakthrough innovations. Second, there is significant and negative effects of affect-related TMT faultline on performance of breakthrough innovations. Third, structural power equality between state-owned and non-state-owned TMT members negatively moderates the relationship between affect-related TMT faultline and perform- ance of breakthrough innovations. Therefore, enterprises should mantain structural power equality between state-owned and non-state-owned TMT members in the mixed firms.

作者林明戚海峰李兴森

机构地区浙江大学宁波理工学院管理学院华东理工大学商学院

出处《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期15-21,共7页 Forecasting

基金国家社会科学基金资助项目(14BGL180)

关键词混合所有制企业高管团队断裂带结构权力突破性创新 mixed firms TMT faultline structural power equality breakthrough innovations

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献30

1March J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.
2Hambrick D C. Upper echelons theory: an update [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32 (2) : 334-343.
3Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons: the organi- zation as a reflection of its top managers[ J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206.
4Lau D C, Murnighan J K. Demographic diversity and fauhlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups[ J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23 ( 2 ) : 325-340.
5Li J, Hambrick D C. Factional groups: a new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams[ J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005,. 48(5) : 794-813.
6Bezrukova K, Jehn K A, Zanutto E L, et al.. Do work- group fauhlines help or hurt? A moderated model of fault- lines, team identification, and group performance [ J ]. Organization Science, 2009, 20 (1) : 35-50.
7Lau D C, Murnighan J K. Interactions within groups and subgroups: the effects of demographic faultlines [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(4) : 645-659.
8Menon T, Phillips K W. Getting even or being at odds? Cohesion in even-and odd-sized small groups [ J ]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(3) : 738-753.
9Thatcher S M, Patel P C. Group faultlines a review, integration, and guide to future research[J]. Journal of Management, 2012, 38(4): 969-1009.
10Carton A M, Cummings J N. The impact of subgroup type and subgroup configurational properties on work team performance [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98(5) : 732-758.

二级参考文献97

1刘志彪,张杰.全球代工体系下发展中国家俘获型网络的形成、突破与对策——基于GVC与NVC的比较视角[J].中国工业经济,2007(5):39-47. 被引量：562
2汪丽,茅宁.共同愿景、决策承诺与决策质量关系实证研究[J].预测,2006,25(6):6-11. 被引量：7
3HAMBRICK D C. Upper Echelons Theory: An Up-date[J]. Academy of Management Review,2007, 32 (2) : 334-343.
4杨国枢,余安邦.中国人的心理与行为:理念及方法篇[M].台北:台湾桂冠图书公司,1992.
5TSUI A S, GUTEK B A. Demographic Differences in Organizations: Current Research and Future Direc tions[M]. Boston: Lexington Books, 1999.
6TSUI A S, O'REILLY III C A. Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32(2): 402-423.
7BANTEL K A, JACKSON S E. Top Management and Innovations in Banking: Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference? [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10(s1): 107-124.
8EISENHARDT K M, KAHWAJY J L, BOURGEOIS L J. Conflict and Strategic Choice: How Top Management Teams Disagree[J]. California Management Review, 1997, 39(2): 42-62.
9ZAJAC E J, GOLDEN B R, SHORTELL S M. New Organizational Forms for Enhancing Innovation: The Case of Internal Corporate Joint Ventures[J]. Management Science, 1991, 37(2): 170-184.
10OREILLY C A, WILLIAMS K Y, BARSADE S. Group Demography and Innovation: Does Diversity Help[J]. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 1998, 1(6): 183-207.