期刊文献+

剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室患者经宫腹腔镜联合手术与阴式手术治疗的临床效果对比分析 被引量:7

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy in Patients with Uterine Incision Diverticulum by Laparoscopy Combined with Hysteroscopy and Transvaginal Surgery after Cesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室患者经宫腹腔镜联合手术与阴式手术治疗的临床效果。方法将我院收治的62例剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室患者分为两组,普通组实施宫腹腔镜联合手术,实验组实施阴式手术,比较两种术式的治疗效果。结果实验组患者术中出血量、手术时间、肛门排气时间等指标均要优于普通组;普通组患者住院时间、并发症发生率优于实验组(P<0.05)。结论在剖宫产术后子宫切口憩室治疗中,阴式手术术中出血量少,能够降低手术风险;而宫腹腔镜联合手术能够缩短患者恢复时间,降低并发症发生风险,医护人员需结合实际科学选择术式。 Objective To analyze clinical efficacy in patients with uterine incision diverticulum by laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy and transvaginal surgery after cesarean section. Methods 62 patients with cesarean section uterine incision diverticulum admitted in our hospital were divided into two groups. Common group was treated with laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy, and observation group was treated with transvaginal surgery. Clinical efficacy of two groups was compared. Results The patients with intraoperative blood loss, operative time, anus exhaust time and other indexes were better than common group; Common group of patients' length of hospital stay, complication rate was better than that of the observation group (P〈0.05). Conclusion In the cesarean section uterine incision diverticulum treatment, transvaginal surgery with less intraoperative blood loss, can reduce the operation risk; And patients with laparoscopic combined surgery can shorten the recovery time, and reduce the risk of complications. Medical staff should be combined with the actual scientific selection procedure.
作者 何岩
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2016年第18期102-103,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 剖宫产 宫腹腔镜 阴式手术 临床效果 Cesarean section Laparoscopy Vaginal operation Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献58

  • 1Gousse AE,Barbaric ZL, Safir MH, et al. Dynamic half Fou- rier acquisition,single stot turbo spin-echo magneticresonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis[J]. J Urol,2000,164 (5) : 1606-1613.
  • 2Engle G, Rushovich AM. True uterin ediverticulum. A par- tial mullerian duct duplication[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 1984,108(9) :734-736.
  • 3Surapaneni K, Silberzweig JE. Cesarean section scar diverticu lum; appearance on hysterosalpingography [J]. Am J Ro- entgeno, 2008, 190(4):870-874.
  • 4KlemmP, Koehler C, Mangler M, et al. Laparoscop ic and vaginal repair of uterine scardeh isc ence follow ing cesarean section as detected by ultrasound [J]. J Perinat Med,2005, 33(4):324-331.
  • 5Fabrec C, Arriagada P, Fernandez C, et al. Surgicaltreament and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bieedingdue to cesarean section scar defect[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2005,12 (1) : 25-28.
  • 6Klemm P,Koehler C, Mangler M, et al. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound[J].J Perinat Med,2005,33(1) :324 - 331.
  • 7Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, et al. Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section[J]. Fetil Steri1,2008,89(4) :974 - 980.
  • 8Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Wiggs CD, el al. Pregnangcy after classic cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 100(5pt1) :946 - 950.
  • 9SurapaneniK, Silberzweig JE. Cesarean section scar diverticulum; appearance on hysterosalpingography [J]. A JR Am J Roentgeno1,2008,190(4) :870 - 874.
  • 10Regnard C,Nosbusch M, Fellemans C, et al. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography[J]. Ultrasound Obstet G ynecot , 2004, 23(3) :289 - 292.

共引文献201

同被引文献42

引证文献7

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部