期刊文献+

社会质量与居民幸福感--以广东四县(区)为考察对象 被引量:10

Social Quality's Impacts on Residents' Sense of Happiness——Taking Four Counties(Districts) in Guangdong as the Subject of Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 十八届三中全会以来,社会建设已上升为国家发展战略的重要组成部分。社会建设和社会治理创新的根本目的是提升社会质量,终极目标是实现社会和谐、人民幸福。基于此,本文从社会质量理论视角出发,以广东四县(区)为考察对象,探讨社会质量四个维度与居民幸福感之间的关系。研究发现,社会融入、社会经济保障、社会赋权与居民幸福感之间均呈显著相关;社会凝聚与居民幸福感没有统计上的显著相关性。基于对这些研究发现的讨论与分析,本文有针对性地提出了提升县域居民幸福感的政策建议,以期为县域社会治理创新提供理论借鉴和决策参考。 since the third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, social construction and innovation of social governance have risen to be an important part of the national development strategy. The fundamental purpose of social construction is to enhance the quality of society, the ultimate goal is the social harmony, people's happiness. Based on this article explored the relationships between the four dimensions of social quality and residents happiness from the perspective of social quality theory, taking four counties (districts) in Guangdong as the cases. The findings include: there have significant correlations between social integration, social economic se- curity, social empowerment and residents' sense of happiness; there has significant correlations between social cohesion and residents' sense of happiness. Based on the discussion and analysis of the findings, ? this paper puts forward policy recommendations to improve residents' sense of happiness, in order to provide theoretical resources and decision - makinz reference for the innnwtinn of social governance.
作者 韩莹莹
出处 《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期109-114,共6页 Chinese Public Administration
基金 广东省哲社项目“广东非公有制经济人士代际支持比较研究”(编号:GD15CZZ01) 广东省高校人文社科项目“基于社会质量的广东县域社会管理创新研究”(编号:Z013WYXM0028) 华南理工大学中央高校科研业务费流动项目“社会建设背景下社会质量评价研究”(编号:D21429W)
关键词 县域 社会质量 居民幸福感 County Social Quality Residents' Sense of Happiness
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Kwan. VS. Y, Bond. M. H, Single is. T. M. Pan cultural Explanations for Life satisfaction:Adding Relationship Harmony to Self - esteem. Journal of Psychology and social Psychology, 1997,73 (5) : 1038 - 1051.
  • 2Yang. Yang. Social Inequalities in Happiness in the u- nited states. 1972 2004 : An Age - Period - Gohort A- nalysis. American Sociology Review , 2008 ( 2 ) : 204 - 226.
  • 3Yip. W, Subramanian. S. V, Mitchell. A. D, Lee. D. T. S, Wang. J, Kawachi. I.. Does social capital enhance health and well - being? Evidence from rural China. social science and medicine, 2007,64 ( 1 ) :35 - 49.
  • 4Ram, R. Social Capital and Happiness: Additional Cross- Country Evidence. Journal of Happiness Stud- ies, 2009,11 (4) :409 -418.
  • 5Haller. Max, Markus. Hadler. How Social Relations and structures Can Produce Happiness and Unhappiness: An International Comparative Analysis. Social Indica- tors Research ,2006 (2) : 169 - 216.
  • 6Blanchflower. D. G, Oswald. A. J. Money, Sex and Happiness: An Empirical Study. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2004,106(3): 393-415.
  • 7Alesina. A, Angeloni. I., Schuknecht. L. What does the European Union do?. Public Choice, 2005:275 -319.
  • 8McBride. M. , Skaperdas. S. 6. Explaining conflict in Low- Income Countries: Incomplete Contracting in the Shadow of the Future. Institutions and Norms in Eco- nomic Development, 2006. ppl41.
  • 9Ferrer - i - Carbonell. A. , Gowdy, J. M.. Environmen- tal degradation and happiness. Ecological Economics, 2007(3) :509 -516.
  • 10Bohnke. P. Does society matter? Life satisfaction in an enlarged Europe. Social Indicators Research, 2008,87 : 189 - 210.

二级参考文献140

共引文献359

同被引文献215

引证文献10

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部