违约损害赔偿的法律经济分析

Analysis of the Economic Responsibility of Breach of Contract

违约责任不应该被简单地理解为道德上的非难,而是立法者通过使行为人承担外部成本而获取违约行为在公共秩序上的允许。应当注意的是,一旦涉及行为人私人的领域,立法的调整应当深入探究其正当性。行为人是履行契约还是违约属于其意志的范畴。因此,尽管违约责任在法律意义上具有一定的强制控制力,但从另一个角度分析,违约责任在经济学意义上是法律学者为违约行为所付责任预先划定的价格尺度;通过经济活动对这一法律行为价格的设定,从而从法律上引导人们的行为,使资源达到最高的利用和最佳的配置,从而达到社会利益的最佳组合。

Liability for breach of contract should not be simply interpreted as moral disapproval, but lawmakers allow the actors bear external cost and obtain the breach of public order. It should be noted that, when it comes to the behavior of people in private are- as, legislation should be adjusted in order to explore the legitimacy. To fulfill the contract or breach of contract belongs to the category of the will. So, though the liability for breach of contract includes the legal force, the force refers to the forced the replacement cost of breach of contract, breach of contract and not to be implemented behavior. The economic essence of liability for breach of contract is a breach of contract price lawmakers set; based on the price level and structure adjustment, indirectly, to guide people＇s behavior, so that resources can have higher efficiency, and ultimatelv imnrove the effieianev of utilization of social resources.