期刊文献+

数字鸿沟与学生学业水平——以PISA 2012上海地区的调查数据为例 被引量:10

Digital Divide and Students' Academic Performance——A Study Based on the Data from PISA 2012 Shanghai
原文传递
导出
摘要 PISA测试2012年的数据表明,在使用倾向值匹配以排除家庭经济地位等诸多背景因素的影响后,互联网仍对上海中学生的学业水平有显著的积极影响。学生首次接触互联网的年龄越早,学生的学业水平发展就越好;而学生首次接触互联网的年龄又与背景因素显著相关;这表明互联网同时也拉开了学业水平的差异,数字鸿沟在持续产生影响。互联网对不平等的再生产论得以证实,但仍不可忽视互联网的积极作用。 Analysis of the data from PISA 2012 Shanghai shows that the internet gives positive impact on students' academic performance,given that most background variables such as family socio- economic status are controlled with the use of propensity score matching. Moreover,the earlier one is exposed to the internet,the better one's academic performance will be. Meanwhile,the age of first internet use is affected by those background variables. As a result,it seems that the internet plays an increasingly essential role in widening the gap of academic performance,and the digital divide is continuously effective. Although the reproduction theory of internet has been proved,the positive impact of internet should not be neglected.
出处 《青年学报》 2016年第3期49-56,共8页 Youth Research
关键词 互联网 学业水平 倾向值 数字鸿沟 internet academic performance propensity score digital divide
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1李升.“数字鸿沟”:当代社会阶层分析的新视角[J].社会,2006,26(6):81-94. 被引量:51
  • 2Dimaggio P, Hargittai E, Neuman W R, et al. Social implications of the Internet [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SO- CIOLOGY. 2001, 27 : 307 - 336.
  • 3Oecd. Understanding the Digital Divide: OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 49OECD Publishing, 2001.
  • 4赵联飞.中国大学生中的三道互联网鸿沟--基于全国12所高校调查数据的分析[J].社会学研究,2015(6):145-168. 被引量:54
  • 5Luu K, Freeman J G. An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia[J]. Computers & Education. 2011, 56 (4) : 1072 -1082.
  • 6Machin S, Mcnally S, Silva O. New Technology in Schools: Is There a Payoff? [J]. The Economic Journal. 2007, 117(522) : 1145 - 1167.
  • 7Biagi F, Loi M. Measuring ICT Use and Learning Outcomes: evidence from recent econometric studies [J]. Euro- pean Journal of Education. 2013, 48( 1 ) : 28 -42.
  • 8Wainer J, Vieira P, Melguizo T. The association between having access to computers and Internet and educational achievement for primary students in Brazil[J]. Computers & Education. 2015, 80:68 -76.
  • 9Wainer J, Dwyer T, Dutra R S, et al. Too much computer and Internet use is bad for your grades, especially if you are young and poor: Results from the 2001 Brazilian SAEB[J]. Computers & Education. 2008, 51 (4) : 1417 - 1429.
  • 10李煜.制度变迁与教育不平等的产生机制——中国城市子女的教育获得(1966—2003)[J].中国社会科学,2006(4):97-109. 被引量:426

二级参考文献169

共引文献768

同被引文献118

引证文献10

二级引证文献119

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部