期刊文献+

磨牙症患者的社会人口学特点与自测健康调查 被引量:7

Survey of the self-rated health status and socio-demographic factors in bruxers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解成人磨牙症患者的社会人口学特点与自测健康情况。方法:选择自测健康评定量表(SRHMS)和自编的社会人口学信息表对自愿参与本研究的452名临床成人患者进行调查,采用非参数MannWhitney检验和单因素方法,分析磨牙症患者的自测健康情况同时了解磨牙症患者的社会人口学特点。结果:本次调查出磨牙症患者1 49名,占总人数的33.0%。已婚者磨牙症阳性率38.5%,未婚者磨牙症阳性率29.0%,不同婚姻状况的磨牙症阳性率差异显著(P<0.05);不同性别、年龄、文化程度和经济收入水平受试对象的磨牙症阳性率比较,差异无统计学意义;自测健康量表评分显示,磨牙症组与非磨牙症组仅在心理症状与负向情绪这一维度上的结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),在其余维度以及自测健康的生理、心理、社会三个子量表得分和健康量表总分上的差异均无统计学意义。结论:磨牙症患者心理症状及负向情绪问题显著,已婚者患磨牙症的比例较高。 Objective: To investigate the health status and socio-demographic factors of adult bruxers. Methods: 452 voluntary adult subjects were recruited, and assessed with a Self-rated health measurement scale-prior test (SRHMS) and a self-designed Socio-demographic information questionnaire. Nonparametric test of Mann-Whitney test and univariate analy- sis were used to analyze the comparison of the self-rated health status between bruxers and non-bruxers, as well as the relationship between bruxism and its relevant social factors. Results: 149 out of 452 subjects (33%) present with bruxism. 38.5% of married subjects and 29.0% of unmarried subjects are bruxers; marriage is a significant factor (P(0.05). Howev- er, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the other social factors: gender, age, educational level and economic income level. There were significant differences on the self-assessment scores of SRHMS between bruxism and non-bruxism group on the dimension ofpsychosocial symptoms and negative emotion (P〈0.05), but no significant dif- ferences on those on other dimensions and three subscales, as well as raw summary scores of SRHMS. Conclusion: Psychosocial symptoms and negative emotion were more significant in patients with bruxism, and the married people showed higher risks for bruxism than the unmarried.
出处 《口腔颌面修复学杂志》 2016年第4期225-228,共4页 Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics
基金 北京市科技计划(项目编号:Z131100006813005)
关键词 磨牙症 自测健康 社会人口学特点 bruxism self-rated health socio-demographic characteristics
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, et al. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2013, 40(1): 2-4.
  • 2Manfredini D, Winocur E, Guarda-Nardini L,el al. Epi- demiology of bruxisnl in adults: a systenlatic review of the literature[J]. J Orofac Pain, 2013, 27(2): 99-tl0.
  • 3Ommerborn MA, Schneider C, Giraki M, et al. E[fects of an occlusal splint compared with cognitive-tx41avioral treat- ment on sleep bruxism activity[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2007, 115 (1):7-14.
  • 4Koyano K, Tsukiyama Y, lchiki R, el al. Aases.ment of bruxism in tile clinic[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 20(t8, 35(7): 495- 5O8.
  • 5Alajbeg IZ, Zuvela A. Risk factors for brtxism among Croa- tian navy employees[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2012, 39(9): 668- 7.
  • 6Buck AA, Neff LA. Stress spillover in early marriage: tim role of self-regulatory depletion[J]. J Faro Psychol, 2012, 26 (5): 698-708.
  • 7Abe Yuka, Suganuma Takeshi. Association of genelic, psy- chological and behavioral factors with sleep bruxism in a Japanese population. Journal of Sleep Rc.at:ch [J1. J Sleep Res, 2012, 21(3): 289-296.
  • 8Soeda R, Tasaka A.influerlce of chewing force on salivary stress markers as indicator of mental stress[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2012, 39(4): 261-269.
  • 9Tasaka A, Takeuchi K. Influence of chewing time on sali- vary stress markers[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2014, 58(1): 48- 5d.

同被引文献36

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部