期刊文献+

非能动先进压水堆核电厂SGTR事故概率安全评价 被引量:5

Probabilistic safety assessment for SGTR in advanced passive nuclear power plant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 蒸汽发生器传热管破裂(Steam Generator Tube Rupture,SGTR)事故是核电厂的重要事故之一,并具有其自身的特点。该事故的研究和评价对核电站安全具有较大意义。选取典型非能动先进压水堆核电厂AP1000的SGTR事故进行一级概率安全评价(Probabilistic Safety Assessment,PSA),采用事件树分析方法得到电厂事件发生后系统、设备和人员不同响应所产生的事故序列,然后建立相关系统的故障树模型进行可靠性分析。借助Risk Spectrum软件,计算SGTR事故导致AP1000核电厂的堆芯损伤频率(Core Damage Probability,CDF),并进行堆芯损伤的最小割集分析及重要度和敏感性分析。通过一系列分析得到导致堆芯损伤的重要基本事件,从而找到系统存在的薄弱环节。 Background: The Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR) accident, which has its own characteristics, is one of the important accidents in nuclear power plants, and it is significant to the safety of the nuclear power station. Purpose: In this paper, AP1000 reactor is selected as the typical advanced passive nuclear power plant to analyze the core damage consequence caused by SGTR accident, so as to find out the weak links existing in the system. Methods: The Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) method in level one has been used to analyze the SGTR accident in API000. After the power plant accident occurs, systems, equipment and personnel respond differently, event tree analysis method is used to obtain sequence, and the systems related to this accident are analyzed by fault tree models. Results: By the Risk Spectrum software, the total Core Damage Probability (CDF) has been calculated, and the minimal cut sets, the importance measures and the sensibility of the core damage have also been analyzed respectively. Conclusion: According to a series of analysis results, the most important basic events resulting in the core damage can be obtained, and the weak link of the system can be found, which has a certain theoretical support for the further strengthening of accident prevention and mitigation of the core damage caused by the accident.
出处 《核技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期73-78,共6页 Nuclear Techniques
基金 国家科技重大专项(No.2013ZX06002001-004)资助~~
关键词 能动先进压水堆核电厂 蒸汽发生器传热管破裂 堆芯损伤频率 概率安全评价 Advanced passive nuclear power plants, SGTR, CDF, PSA
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献25

  • 1李悠然,刘爱国,孙伟,张龙强,杨健.基于DCS概率安全分析技术的仪控功能分组方法探讨[J].核科学与工程,2012,32(S2):158-163. 被引量:2
  • 2苑春强.美国的新能源政策[J].国际资料信息,2001(12):6-9. 被引量:2
  • 3Severe accident risks: An assessment for five U. S. nuclear power plants. NUREG-1150, 1990. 1-691.
  • 4RiskSpectrum PSA ASCII Format User Manual. RELCON SCANDPOWER AB Version 1.00.00, 2007. 1-13.
  • 5Box P O. User's manual for the CENTS Code[Z], Vol.1,2005.
  • 6User's Manual of RELAP5/MOD3.2 Code[Z], Vol.2, NUREG/CR-5535, 1995.7.
  • 7Wiseman D A. AP 1000 Plant Parameters[Z], 2003.11.
  • 8AP1000 Plant Description and Safety Analysis Report[R], WCAP-15612 (Non-Proprietary), US Westinghouse Co. Ltd., PA,USA, 2000.
  • 9ZHENG Limin. Pressurizer volume demonstration analysis[R], Proceeding of 13th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering(ICONE13), ICONE13-50569, May 16-20, 2005, Beijing, China.
  • 10US NRC. Use of probabilistic risk assessment methods in nuclear regulatory activities, final policy statement[R]. 1995.

共引文献58

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部