期刊文献+

耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌感染危险因素分析:一项病例-病例-对照研究 被引量:8

Case-case-control study of risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannff infection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨影响碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)感染的危险因素,为临床CRAB的诊治和预防提供依据。方法对天津医科大学总医院2011年1月至2015年12月无菌体液中细菌培养阳性的病例资料进行回顾性分析,按1:1:1设计病例一病例一对照研究,CRAB感染组68例,碳青霉烯类敏感鲍曼不动杆菌(CSAB)感染组68例,并在匹配患者中随机选取68例无菌体液中培养出非鲍曼不动杆菌阳性患者作为对照。对鲍曼不动杆菌感染的危险因素进行单因素分析,将单因素分析中差异有统计学意义的因素进行多因素Logistic回归。结果单因素分析中,CRAB组与对照组比较发现,菌血症/脓毒血症、使用碳青霉烯类抗生素、使用β-内酰胺酶抑制剂复合制剂、使用替加环素、联合使用抗菌药物、使用糖皮质激素,1个月内进行过手术、机械通气、中央静脉插管、动脉穿刺、留置导尿管≥3d、胃管插管均为CRAB感染的危险因素(x^2=4.96、15.56、7.64、9.22、5.89、6.80、17.00、11.83、18.22、8.24、25.24和7.70,P〈0.05或〈0.01);CSAB组与对照组比较,使用三代头孢菌素、中央静脉插管、分离菌株前总的住院时间为CSAB感染的危险因素(x^2=11.93和6.94,U=1555,P〈0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析中,菌血症/脓毒血症[OR=4.01,95%可信区间(CI):1.13~14.20)、使用碳青霉烯类抗生素(OR=4.17,95%CI:1.79~9.73)、中央静脉插管(OR=2.93,95%CI:1.22~7.08)、留置导尿管≥3d(OR=6.08,95%C1:2.39~15.46)为CRAB感染的独立危险因素;使用三代头孢菌素(OR:3.98,95%CI:1.88~8.43)、中央静脉插管(OR=3.40,95%CI:1.48~7.81)为CSAB感染的独立危险因素。结论长期使用碳青霉烯类抗生素及进行侵入性操作是CRAB感染的危险因素,临床上应合理使用抗菌药物,最大限度地减少患者的有创操作,降低CRAB的感染。 Objective To assess the risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infection. Methods Clinical data of patients with positive bacterial culture in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital during January 2011 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, including 68 patients with carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bacteremia, 68 patients with carbapenem sensitive Acinetobacter baumannii (CSAB) bacteremia, and 68 patients with positive culture of other bacteria ( control group). The risk factors ofAcinetobacter baumannii infection were analyzed by univatiate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses. Results Univariate analysis showed that bacteremia/sepsis,use of carbapenems, 13-1actamase inhibitor compound, tigecycline, combined antibiotics, glucocorticoids, surgery within one month, mechanical ventilation, central venous catheters (CVCs), arteriopuncture,indwelling catheters〉3 days and indwelling gastric tube were risk factors of CRAB infection(CRAB vs. control: x^2 =4.96, 15.56,7.64,9.22,5.89,6.80, 17.00, 11.83,18.22,8.24,25.24 and 7.70, P 〈 0. 05 or P 〈 0. 01, respectively) ; while use of third-generation cephalosporin, CVCs, length of hospital stay were risk factors of CSAB infection ( CSAB vs. control: x^2 = 11.93 and 6. 94, U = 1555, P 〈 0. 05 ). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that bacteremia/sepsis ( OR = 4. 01, 95% CI: 1.13 - 14. 20), use ofcarbapenems (OR=4.17, 95%CI :1.79-9.73), CVCs (OR=2.93, 95% CI: 1. 22 - 7. 08 ) , indwelling catheters〉3 days ( OR = 6. 08,95% CI: 2. 39 - 15.46) were independent risk factors of CRAB infection ; use of third-generation cephalosporin ( OR = 3.98, 95% CI : 1.88 - 8.43 ), CVCs ( OR = 3.40, 95% CI:1. 48 - 7.81 ) were independent risk factors of CSAB infection. Conclusions Long-term use of carbapenems and invasive procedures are associated with CRAB infection, strict control of invasive procedures and rational use of antibiotics may reduce CRAB irrfection.
出处 《中华临床感染病杂志》 2016年第3期224-229,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases
基金 天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划(15JCYBJC26300)
关键词 鲍氏不动杆菌 抗药性 多药 危险因素 病例-病例-对照研究 Acinetobacter baumannii Drug resistance, multiple Risk factors Case-case- control study
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen [J].Clin Microbiol Rev, 2008,21 (3) :538-582. DOI: 10. 1128/CMR. 00058-07.
  • 2胡付品,朱德妹,汪复,蒋晓飞,徐英春,张小江,张朝霞,季萍,谢轶,康梅,王传清,王爱敏,徐元宏,沈继录,孙自镛,陈中举,倪语星,孙景勇,褚云卓,田素飞,胡志东,李金,俞云松,林洁,单斌,杜艳,韩艳秋,郭素芳,魏莲花,吴玲,张泓,孔菁,胡云建,艾效曼,卓超,苏丹虹.2014年CHINET中国细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2015,15(5):401-410. 被引量:727
  • 3Hu FP, Zhu DM, Wang F, et al. CHINET 2014 surveillance of bacterial resistance in China[ J]. Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy ,2015,15 (5) :401-410.
  • 4Chopra T, Marchaim D, Awali RA, et al. Epidemiology of bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii and impact of drug resistance to both Carbapenems and Ampicillin- Sulbactam on clinical outcomes [ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2013, 57 (12) :6270-6275. DOI: 10. l128/AAC. 01520-13.
  • 5Lee YT, Kuo SC, Yang SP, et al. Impact of appropriate antimierobial therapy on mortality associated with Acinetobacter baumannii baeteremia : relation to severity of infection [J].Clin Infeet Dis, 2012,55(2) :209-215. DOI: 10. 1093/cid/cis385.
  • 6Ng TM, Teng CB, Lye DC, et al. A multicenter case-case control study for risk factors and outcomes of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia [ J ]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2014, 35( 1 ) :49-55. DOI: 10. 1086/674387.
  • 7Ozgur ES, Horasan ES, Karaca K, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia due to extensive drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes[ J]. Am J Infect Control, 2014, 42(2) :206-208. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ajic. 2013.09. 003.
  • 8Guo W, Sheng J, Gu Y, et al. Analysis and forecast for muhidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections among liver transplant recipients[ J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46 (5) : 1448- 1452. DOI: 10. 1016/j. transpmceed. 2014.02. 027.
  • 9Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S24 Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-fourth informational supplement [ S ]. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2014.
  • 10王辉,俞云松,王明贵,倪语星,马越,任健康,韩锟,卓超,徐英春,胡云建,胡志东,曹彬,罗燕萍,褚云卓,廖康,康梅,张冀霞.替加环素体外药敏试验操作规程专家共识[J].中华检验医学杂志,2013,36(7):584-587. 被引量:133

二级参考文献22

  • 1Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-first informational supplement. MI00-S22. Wayne, PA:CLSI,2012.
  • 2European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version I. I, 2010-04-27.
  • 3Jones RN, Ferraro MJ, Reller LB, et al. Multicenter studies of tigecycline disk diffusion susceptibility results for Acinetobacter spp.J Clin Microbiol,2007 ,45 :227-230.
  • 4Fernrindez-Mazarrasa C, Mazarrasa 0, CalvoJ, et al. High concerntration of mananese in Mueller-Hinton agar increase MICs of tigecyc:line determined by Etest.J Clin Microbiol, 2009, 47: 827-829.
  • 5Bradford PA, Petersen PJ, Young M, et al. Tigecycline MIC testing by broth dilution requires use of fresh medium or addition of the biocatalytic oxygen-reducing reagent oxyrase to standardize the test method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother ,2005,49 :3903-3909.
  • 6Curcio D, Fernandez F. Comment on: Effect of different Mueller?Hinton agars on tigecycline disc diffusion susceptibility for Acinetobacter spp.J Antimicrob Chemother ,2008,62: 1166-1167.
  • 7Casal M, Rodriguez F,Johnson B, et al. Influence of testing methodology on the tigecycline activity profile against presumably tigecycline-nan-susceptible Acinetobacter spp.J Antimicrob Chemather, 2009, 64:69-72.
  • 8Zarkotou 0, Pournaras S, Altouvas G, et al. Comparative evaluation of tigecycline susceptibility testing methods far expanded-spectrum cephalosporin and carbapenem-resistant gram?negative pathogens.J Clin Microbiol, 2012, 50 :3747-3750.
  • 9LiuJW, Ko WC, Huang CH, et al. Agreement assessment of tigecycline susceptibilities determined by the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods among commonly encountered resistant bacterial isolates: results from the Tigecycline In Vitro Surveillance in Taiwan (TIST) study, 2008 to 2010. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2012, 56:1414-1417.
  • 10Huang TD, Berhin C, Bogaerts P, et al. In vitro susceptibility of multi drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates to tigecycline.J Antimicrob Chemother, 2012, 67 :2696-2699.

共引文献936

同被引文献78

引证文献8

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部