期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死介入治疗术后远期心功能评价

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究急性心肌梗死介入治疗术后远期心功能。方法 123例急性心肌梗死患者,根据治疗方法不同分为溶栓组(41例)和介入组(42例)、无溶栓无介入组(40例)。溶栓组行静脉溶栓治疗;介入组行介入治疗;无溶栓无介入组仅用常规药物治疗。观察三组治疗前和治疗后12个月患者脑钠肽(BNP)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)的差异。结果治疗前三组BNP、LVEF、LVEDD水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后介入组、溶栓组BNP、LVEF、LVEDD水平较无溶栓无介入组改善更显著(P<0.05);介入组BNP、LVEF、LVEDD水平[(42.18±14.71)ng/L、(56.22±7.59)%、(45.58±4.26)mm]较溶栓组[(102.43±36.29)ng/L、(50.11±7.94)%、(50.28±6.12)mm]改善更显著(P<0.05)。结论急性心肌梗死介入治疗术后远期心功能改善显著,对患者预后有益,值得推广。
出处 《中国实用医药》 2016年第21期85-86,共2页 China Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

  • 1丁明学,魏向龙,刘映峰,李志梁,赵霞,秦永文.心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔同时行经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术及Amplatzer封堵器堵闭一例[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2004,12(6):380-381. 被引量:1
  • 2谢洪智,朱文玲.重组人脑利钠肽和硝酸甘油治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭疗效和安全性的随机、开放、平行对照的多中心临床研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(3):222-226. 被引量:228
  • 3Lee E M,Roberts D H,Walsh K P.Transcatheter closure of a residual postmyocardial infarction ventricular septal defect with the Amplatzer septal occluder[J].Heart,1998,80(5):522-4.
  • 4Hachida M,Nakano H,Hirai M,et al.Percutaneous transaortic closure of postinfarctional ventricular septal rupture[J].Ann Thorac Surg,1991,51(4):655-9.
  • 5European Association for Pereutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocar- dial Revascularizatlon of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) andthe European Association for Cardio - Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2010, 31 (20) : 2501 -2555.
  • 6Every NR, Parsons LS, Hlatky M, et al. A comparison of thrombolytlc therapy with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Investigators [J]. N Engl JMed, 1996, 335 (17): 1253-1260.
  • 7Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy fur acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group E J ]. N Engl J Med, 1993, 328 (10) : 673 -679.
  • 8Stone GW, Cox D, Garcia E, et al. Normal flow ( TIMI - 3 ) prior to mechanical reperfusion therspy is an independent determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trials [J]. Circulation, 2001, 104 (6) : 636 -641.
  • 9So DY, Ha AC, Davies RF, et al. ST segment resolution in patients with tenecteplase - facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus tenecteplese alone: insights from the Combined Angioplasty and Pharma- cological Intervention versus Thrombolysis ALone in Acute Myocardial In- farction (CAPITAL AMI) trial [J]. Can J Cardiol, 2010, 26 (1) : e7 - el2.
  • 10Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ( ASSENT - 4 PC1) investigators. Primary versus tenecteplese - facilitated percutaneous coronary interven- tion in patients with ST - segment elevation acute myocardial i~arction ( ASSENT - 4 PCI ) : randomised trial [ J ]. Lancet, 2006, 367 (9510) : 569 -578.

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部