期刊文献+

侦查情报分析中的认知闭合需要及其偏差修正 被引量:13

Need for Cognitive Closure in the Analysis of Criminal Investigation Intelligence and Its Bias Correction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]情报分析中过高的认知闭合需要水平会产生多种认知偏差,导致情报分析人员匆忙而有失偏颇地处理信息材料,急于得出结论。对此展开研究有助于情报分析人员改善因该动机而导致的偏差,提升情报产品质量。[方法/过程]通过对认知闭合需要的属性及其研究现状的考察,指出侦查情报分析中此类偏差的典型样态,如证实偏差、首因效应偏差、启发式思维偏差等,进而提出修正策略。[结果/结论]认为引入批判性思维工具、缓解和调试时间压力、让侦查人员承担相应的过错责任以及优化侦查情报分析与决策人员搭配组合等方法可有效削弱和降低此类偏差对情报分析的不良影响。 [ Purpose/Significance ] A high level of cognitive closure in the intelligence analysis can lead to a variety of cognitive biases, which may result in a situation of dealing with the information material in a hurry and being eager to draw a conclusion by the intelligence analysts. This study will help the intelligence analysts to correct the biases caused by this motivation and improve the quality of intelligence products. [ Method/Process] The study explores the cognitive closure properties, reviews the status quo of the related research, points out that this kind of bias in the criminal investigation intelligence analysis includes confirmation bias, primacy effects bias and heuristic think- ing bias, and then puts forward correction strategy. [ Result/Conclusion] Mastering critical thinking, easing debugging time pressure, taking responsibility for fault and optimizing the team arrangement of investigation intelligence analyst and decision support personnel are found to be effective in weakening and reducing the adverse effects of such biases on intelligence analysis.
作者 刘杰
出处 《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期7-10,6,共5页 Journal of Intelligence
关键词 情报分析 侦查情报 认知闭合需要 认知偏差 intelligence analysis criminal investigation intelligence need for cognitive closure cognitive bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Pierro A, et al. Person-group fit on the need for cognitive clo- sure as a predictor of job performance [ J ]. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2015, 19(2) : 77.
  • 2刘雪峰,张志学,梁钧平.认知闭合需要、框架效应与决策偏好[J].心理学报,2007,39(4):611-618. 被引量:66
  • 3刘雪峰,张志学.认知闭合需要研究评述[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(1):51-55. 被引量:36
  • 4Ask K, Granhag P A. Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations [ J ]. Journal of Investigative Psychol- ogy and Offender Profiling, 2005, 2( 1 ) : 43-63.
  • 5王均平.侦查认知及行为选择证实偏差的诊断与修正[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版),2013,29(1):63-76. 被引量:13
  • 6魏猛.首因效应视角下的网络谣言控制[J].江苏警官学院学报,2012,27(1):121-125. 被引量:8
  • 7Giacomantonio M. Individual Differences Underlying Punish- ment Motivation[ J]. Social Psychology, 2014,45 ( 6 ) : 449 - 457.
  • 8[美]约书亚.德雷斯勒,等.美国刑事诉讼法精解.第一卷[M].吴宏耀,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009:567.
  • 9Krynski T R. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2007, 136 (3) : 430.
  • 10[美]D.AlanBensley.心理学批判性思维[M].李小平等译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2005.

二级参考文献123

共引文献111

同被引文献239

引证文献13

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部