基于技术链的专利引用关系计量及其意义被引量：7

Patent Citation Analysis Based on Technology Chain

下载PDF

导出

摘要 [目的/意义]企业专利对技术价值链上下游企业专利的引用关系中蕴含着技术的衔接与合作,而由于上下游的企业往往分属不同行业,因此,跨行业的专利引用行为应该是企业成功嵌入技术链实现价值增值的信号。[方法/过程]以2014年世界500强企业专利为案例,统计各企业专利被引情况,计算各企业"跨行业专利引用率"并将之与企业排名进行相关性分析。[结果/结论]发现在17个制造业行业中的13个行业内,"跨行业专利引用率"与企业排名之间表现出显著的相关性:排名越前的企业其"跨行业专利引用率"越高。此发现实证了"跨行业专利引用率"这一指标对专利价值的正面评价意义。基于此,提出了在专利引文分析指标体系中补充"跨行业专利引用率"这一计量指标的建议。 [ Purpose/Significance ] Enterprises＇ patents citation of the patents of upstream ＆ downstream enterprises among the technical value chain always involves different industries, which implies the technical joint and cooperation. And cross-industry citation is supposed to be the signal of enterprises; successful linking into the technical chain and achieving value added. [ Method/Process] This paper conducts a case study on global 500 of 2014,counting their patents citation and computing their ＂cross-industry patent citation rate＂. [ Result/Conclusion] We find that cross-industry patent citation and enterprise value are significantly related to each other in 13 of 17 manufacturing industries. The higher the firm＇s ranking, the higher the finn＇s ＂cross-industry patent citation rate＂ is. This discovery proves that the ＂cross-industry patent citation rate＂ is a positive evaluation indicator of patent value. And it is suggested that the ＂cross-industry patent citation rate＂ be added to the patent citation analysis system.

作者周维李睿

机构地区四川大学公共管理学院信息资源管理系

出处《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期114-121,127,共9页 Journal of Intelligence

基金国家社会科学基金项目"复杂语境下专利引用行为机制与专利引文评价的相关性研究"(编号:13BTQ056)研究成果之一四川学术成果分析与应用研究中心项目"技术博弈视野下的四川专利评价"(编号:SCAA14B09)资助

关键词技术链专利计量专利引用引文分析 technology chain patentmerics patent citation citation analysis

分类号 G255.53 [文化科学—图书馆学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献35

1Narin F. Patents bibliometrics [ J ]. Scientometrics, 1994,30 (1) :147-155.
2文庭孝.专利信息计量研究综述[J].图书情报知识,2014,31(5):72-80. 被引量：48
3Reitzig M. What determines patent value? : Insights from the semiconductor industry[ J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32 ( 1 ) : 13 -26.
4Hsiu - Yan Lin, Jiang - Liang Hou. A multiple regression model for patent appraisal. [ J ]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2006, 106(106) :1304-1332.
5Kimura T, Tanaka Y. Research on evaluation technique of pa- tented invention using both technical value and economic value [ C ]//Technology Management for Global Economic Growth, 2010:1-7.
6Lee Y G, Lee J D, Song Y I, et al. An in-depth empirical anal-ysis of patent citation counts using zero-inflated count data mod- el: The case of KIST[ J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 70 (1):27- 39.
7Silverberg G, Verspagen B. The size distribution of innovations revisited: An application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance [J]. Journal of Econo- metrics, 2007, 139(2):318-339.
8Harhoff D, Scherer F M, Vopel K. Citations, family size, op- position and the value of patent rights [ J ]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(8) :1343-1363.
9Criscuolo P. The "home advantage" effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO [ J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 66( 1 ) :23-41.
10李清海,刘洋,吴泗宗,许晓冰.专利价值评价指标概述及层次分析[J].科学学研究,2007,25(2):281-286. 被引量：90