摘要
现有土壤重金属污染评价方法较多,应用比较广泛的为内梅罗指数法和模糊综合评价法,为分析这2种方法存在的优势和局限之处,将其分别应用于贵溪冶炼厂和无锡市2个实例评价中,比较2种方法评价的差异并分析其原因。结果表明,不同评价方法的评价结果受到区域尺度和污染程度的影响。当研究区域污染严重且区域尺度较小时,内梅罗指数法的评价结果较为准确;当研究区域污染较轻且区域尺度较小时,模糊综合评价法的评价结果较为准确;而当研究区域污染较轻且区域较大时,2种方法评价结果基本无差别。
There are many heavy metal evaluation methods. Nemerow index method and fuzzy comprehensiveevaluation method are used widely. Comparing these two methods in evaluating a smelting plant in Guixi andtwo other cases in W uxi, for the purpose of analyzing the advantages and limitations of the methods, resultsshowed that the evaluation was influenced by the regional scale and the degree of pollution. Nemerow indexmethod is relatively accurate in small regional scale with seriously pollution, while fuzzy comprehensive evaluationmethod is more accurate in small regional scale with slight pollution. When the evaluation is in large regionalscale with slight pollution, there is no difference between the two methods.
出处
《环境监测管理与技术》
CSCD
2016年第4期27-31,共5页
The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(41371484)
环保部重金属污染防治专项"江铜贵冶周边区域九牛岗土壤修复示范项目"基金资助项目
南京农业大学人文社会科学重大招标基金资助项目(SKZD201302)
关键词
内梅罗指数法
模糊综合评价法
差异分析
重金属污染
土壤
Nemerow index
Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
Different analysis
Heavy metal pollution
Soils