期刊文献+

含有居间量词most的广义三段论的有效性 被引量:6

The Validity of Generalized Syllogisms Including the Intermediate Quantifier most
原文传递
导出
摘要 一般而言,居间量词是语义上的<1,1>类型的广义量词,表示事物或材料所形成的集合之间的二元关系。通过提出并证明23个事实,阐明包含most这一居间量词的有效的广义三段论推理模式。这些创新性成果将会有利于广义量词理论的发展、自然语言信息处理以及计算机科学中的知识表示和知识推理。 In general, the intermediate quantifiers are semantically of type 〈 1,1 〉 generalized quantifiers. That is, they are binary relations between sets of things or stuff. This paper proposes and proves 23 facts that illustrate the valid inferential patterns of generalized syllogisms including the intermediate quantifier most. These innovative achievements will benefit the development of generalized quantifier theory, natural information processing, knowledge reoresentation and reasoning in the computer science.
作者 张晓君
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期27-31,共5页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金西部项目(15XYY012) 国家社科基金一般项目(16BZ081)
关键词 广义量词 居间量词 广义三段论 有效性 generalized quantifiers intermediate quantifiers generalized syllogisms validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1张晓君.广义量词的语义性质研究[D].北京:中国社会科学院,2011.
  • 2林胜强,张晓君.广义量词的推理模式研究[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,17(6):29-33. 被引量:9
  • 3] M urinovt P, Nov6k V. A formal theory of generalized intermediate syllogisms [ J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2012,186 (1) : 47 - 80.
  • 4郝一江.自然语言语篇推理的形式化探究[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,19(1):33-37. 被引量:9
  • 5Peterson P. Intermediate quantifiers [ C ]//Logic, Linguistics, and Aristotelian Semantics. Ashagate, Aldershot, 2000.
  • 6Novak Y. A formal theory of Intermediate quantifiers [ J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2008,159( 10): 1229 -1246.
  • 7Novdk V. On fuzzy type theory [ J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2005,149 (3) :235 - 273.
  • 8Novdk V. A comprehensive theory of trichotomous evaluative linguistic expressions [ J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2008, 159 (22) :2939 - 2969.
  • 9Peters S, Westersthhl D. Quantifiers in Language and Logic [ M ]. Claredon Press: 2006.
  • 10张晓君,林胜强.如何利用广义量词的语义性质判断扩展三段论的有效性[J].逻辑学研究,2013,6(2):42-56. 被引量:9

二级参考文献30

  • 1林胜强,张晓君.广义量词的推理模式研究[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014,17(6):29-33. 被引量:9
  • 2J. Barwise and R. Cooper, 1981,“Generalized quantifiers and natural language”,Lin-guistics and Philosophy, 4(2): 159-219.
  • 3J. Barwise and J. Etchemendy, 2003, Language, Proof and Logic,Stanford, CA: CSLIPublications.
  • 4J. van Eijck, 2005,“Syllogistics = monotonicity + symmetry + existential import”,http://www.oai.cwi.nl/oai/asset/10940/10940D.pdf.
  • 5C. K. Fat, 2012,Inferential Patterns of Generalized Quantifiers and their Applicationsto Scalar Reasoning, Ph. D. dissertation, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
  • 6E. L. Keenan and D. Westerstahl, 1997,“Generalized quantifiers in linguistics andlogic”,in J. Benthem and A. Meulen (eds.),Handbook of Logic and Language, 14,837—893,Amsterda: Elsevier.
  • 7W. A. Murphree, 1991,Numerically Exceptive Logic: A Reduction of the ClassicalSyllogism, New York: P. Lang.
  • 8S. Peters and D. Westerstahl, 2006, Quantifiers in Language and Logic,Oxford: Clare-don Press.
  • 9P. L. Peterson, 2000, Intermediate Quantifiers: Logic, Linguistics, and AristotelianSemantics, Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • 10F. Sommers and G, Englebretsen, 2000, An Invitation to Formal Reasoning: The logicof Terms, Aldershot: Ashgate.

共引文献16

同被引文献23

引证文献6

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部