期刊文献+

复方多粘菌素B软膏联合地奈德乳膏治疗亚急性/慢性湿疹的多中心、随机、双盲、平行对照临床研究 被引量:21

Compound polymyxin B ointment combined with desonide cream for the treatment of subacute or chronic ;eczema:a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled clinical study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨复方多粘菌素B软膏联合地奈德乳膏治疗亚急性/慢性湿疹的临床疗效和安全性。方法采用多中心、随机、双盲、平行对照临床研究,入选亚急性湿疹患者144例(试验组72例,对照组72例),慢性湿疹患者144例(试验组72例,对照组72例)。试验组与对照组分别外用复方多粘菌素B软膏和复方多粘菌素B软膏基质,隔3h后两组均使用地奈德乳膏,每日交替使用各2次。记录患者的症状/体征(包括瘙痒程度、炎症程度、糜烂/渗出程度、浸润/肥厚程度及靶皮损面积)和时间指标(瘙痒减轻起效时间、瘙痒减轻缓解时间)。分析两组的疗效,评估安全性。结果试验组和对照组的症状/体征总分在用药7d(亚急性湿疹:试验组6.09±2.78,对照组8.26±3.17;慢性湿疹:试验组6.56±2.68,对照组8.84±2.90)和14 d(亚急性湿疹:试验组3.68±3.18,对照组5.28±4.05;慢性湿疹:试验组4.38±3.27,对照组6.25±3.78)均较基线水平(亚急性湿疹:试验组13.44±1.66,对照组13.60±1.75;慢性湿疹:试验组12.96±1.16,对照组12.64±1.18)有不同程度的下降。试验组亚急性、慢性湿疹患者在用药7、14 d后的症状/体征均较相应的对照组低,差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。亚急性湿疹患者中,试验组瘙痒和浸润肥厚评分的下降幅度均显著高于对照组(均P〈0.01);慢性湿疹患者中,试验组瘙痒、浸润肥厚和靶皮损面积评分的下降幅度均显著高于对照组(均P〈0.05)。亚急性湿疹患者试验组瘙痒减轻起效时间短于对照组,但瘙痒减轻缓解时间长于对照组(均P〈0.05);慢性湿疹患者试验组瘙痒减轻起效时间短于对照组(P〈0.0001),但瘙痒减轻缓解时间与对照组差异无统计学意义。试验组医生和患者对治疗效果的满意度均高于对照组(均P〈0.05)。结论外用复方多粘菌素B软膏可增强外用地奈德乳膏治疗亚急性和慢性湿疹的疗效,且对亚急性湿疹的效果更为显著。复方多粘菌素B软膏还能较好地控制湿疹患者的瘙痒症状和浸润肥厚。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of compound polymyxin B ointment combined with desonide cream for the treatment of subacute or chronic eczema. Methods A multicenter, randomized, double?blind, parallel?group, controlled clinical study was conducted. Totally, 144 patients with subacute eczema and 144 patients with chronic eczema were enrolled into this study, and both randomly and equally divided into the test group and control group. The test group and control group firstly topically applied compound polymyxin B ointment and its vehicle respectively, then both topically applied desonide cream 3 hours later. The drugs or vehicle were applied twice a day in all the patients. Patients′ symptoms and signs (including degree of itching, inflammation, erosion/exudation and infiltration/thickening, as well as area of target lesions) were evaluated, and the time to onset and duration of itching?alleviating effect were recorded. The clinical efficacy and safety of treatments were analyzed and compared between the test group and control group. Results The total symptom and sign scores significantly decreased to different extents on days 7 and 14 in the test group(subacute eczema patients:6.09 ± 2.78 and 3.68 ± 3.18 vs. 13.44 ± 1.66; chronic eczema patients: 6.56 ± 2.68 and 4.38 ± 3.27 vs. 12.96 ± 1.16)and control group(subacute eczema patients:8.26 ± 3.17 and 5.28 ± 4.05 vs. 13.60 ± 1.75;chronic eczema patients: 8.84 ± 2.90 and 6.25 ± 3.78 and vs. 12.64 ± 1.18)compared with those at baseline. Moreover, the total symptom and sign score of patients with subacute or chronic eczema was significantly lower in the test group than in the control group on days 7 and 14(all P〈0.05). A significant increment was observed in the degree of decrease in scores for itch, infiltration/thickening in patients with subacute eczema in the test group compared with that in the control group(all P〈0.01), as well as in scores for itch, infiltration/thickening and area of target lesions in patients with chronic eczema in the test group compared with those in the control group (all P 〈 0.05). In addition, patients with subacute eczema in the test group showed significantly shorter onset and longer duration of itching?alleviating effect than those in the control group(both P〈0.05). The time to onset of itching?alleviating effect was also significantly shorter in patients with chronic eczema in the test group than in those in the control group(P〈0.000 1), but there was no significant difference in the duration of it between the two groups of patients with chronic eczema. Clinicians and patients were both more satisfied with therapeutic effects in the test group than in the control group(all P〈0.05). Conclusions Topical compound polymyxin B ointment can increase the efficacy of topical desonide cream for the treatment of subacute or chronic eczema, especially subacute eczema. Compound polymyxin B ointment also shows a favorable therapeutic effect on itching and infiltration/thickening in patients with eczema.
出处 《中华皮肤科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期541-546,共6页 Chinese Journal of Dermatology
基金 中国中西医结合学会-皮肤病研究基金 2013年高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20131106120046) 北京协和医学院协和青年基金(3332014008)
关键词 湿疹 多粘菌素B 地奈德 随机对照试验 Eczema Polymyxin B Desonide Randomized controlled trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1弓娟琴,林麟,郝飞,陈艳,曾凡钦,李伯有,毕志刚,张美华,易东,赵辨.湿疹和特应性皮炎皮损处细菌定植情况及药物联合治疗的分析[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2004,37(9):515-518. 被引量:95
  • 2毕志刚,田美华,林麟,仇宁,郝飞,钟白玉,尹若菲,曾凡钦,赵辨.湿疹与特应性皮炎皮损处细菌学研究[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2004,37(10):595-597. 被引量:102
  • 3陈文琦,张美华,毕志刚,梅亚宁,赵辨.特应性皮炎和湿疹皮肤金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素及中毒休克综合征毒素-1的检测[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2005,38(9):560-562. 被引量:6
  • 4Abeck D, Mempel M. Staphylococcus aureus colonization in atopic dermatitis and its therapeutic implications. Br J Dermatol, 1998, 139Suppl 53:13-16.
  • 5Goh CL, Wong JS, Giam YC. Skin colonization of Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis patients seen at the National Skin Center,Singapore. Int J Dermatol, 1997, 36: 653-657.
  • 6Breuer K, Haussler S, Kapp A, et al. Staphylococcus aureus: colonizaing features and influence of an antibacterial treatment in adults with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol, 2002, 147: 55-61.
  • 7Breuer K, Kapp A, Werfel T. Bacterial infections and atopic dermatitis. Allergy, 2001, 56: 1034-1041.
  • 8Leung DY. Atopic dermatitis and the immune system: the role of superantigens and bacteria. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2001, 45:S13-S16.
  • 9Leyden JJ, Marples RR, Kligman AM. Staphylococcus aureus in the lesions of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol, 1974, 90:525-530.
  • 10Feingold DS. Bacterial adherence, colonization, and pathogenicity.Arch Dermatol, 1986, 122:161-163.

共引文献176

同被引文献179

引证文献21

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部