期刊文献+

Comparison of corneal flaps created by Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers 被引量:2

Comparison of corneal flaps created by Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To assess and compare the morphology of corneal flaps created by the Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers in laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK).METHODS:Four hundred eyes of 200 patients were enrolled in this study and divided into Wavelight FS200 groups(200 eyes) and Intralase FS60 groups(200 eyes).Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography(RTVue OCT) was used to measure the corneal flap thickness of 36 specified measurements on each flap one week after surgery.Results were used to analyze the regularity,uniformity and accuracy of the two types of LASIK flaps.RESULTS:The mean thickness of corneal flap and central flap was 105.71±4.72 μm and 105.39±4.50 μm in Wavelight FS200 group and 109.78±11.42 μm and 109.15±11.59 μm in Intralase FS60 group,respectively.The flaps made with the Wavelight FS200 femtosecond laser were thinner than those created by the Intralase FS60 femtosecond laser(P=0.000).Corneal flaps in the 2 groups were uniform and regular,showing an almost planar configuration.But the Wavelight FS200 group has more predictability and uniformity of flap creation.The mean deviation between achieved and attempted flap thickness was smaller in the Wavelight FS200 group than that in the Intralase FS60 group,which were 5.18±3.71 μm and 8.68±7.42 μm respectively.The deviation of more than 20 μm was 0.2% measurements in Wavelight FS200 group and 8.29% measurements in Intralase FS60 group.CONCLUSION:The morphologies of flaps created by Wavelight FS200 are more uniform and thinner than those created by Intralase FS60. AIM:To assess and compare the morphology of corneal flaps created by the Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers in laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK).METHODS:Four hundred eyes of 200 patients were enrolled in this study and divided into Wavelight FS200 groups(200 eyes) and Intralase FS60 groups(200 eyes).Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography(RTVue OCT) was used to measure the corneal flap thickness of 36 specified measurements on each flap one week after surgery.Results were used to analyze the regularity,uniformity and accuracy of the two types of LASIK flaps.RESULTS:The mean thickness of corneal flap and central flap was 105.71±4.72 μm and 105.39±4.50 μm in Wavelight FS200 group and 109.78±11.42 μm and 109.15±11.59 μm in Intralase FS60 group,respectively.The flaps made with the Wavelight FS200 femtosecond laser were thinner than those created by the Intralase FS60 femtosecond laser(P=0.000).Corneal flaps in the 2 groups were uniform and regular,showing an almost planar configuration.But the Wavelight FS200 group has more predictability and uniformity of flap creation.The mean deviation between achieved and attempted flap thickness was smaller in the Wavelight FS200 group than that in the Intralase FS60 group,which were 5.18±3.71 μm and 8.68±7.42 μm respectively.The deviation of more than 20 μm was 0.2% measurements in Wavelight FS200 group and 8.29% measurements in Intralase FS60 group.CONCLUSION:The morphologies of flaps created by Wavelight FS200 are more uniform and thinner than those created by Intralase FS60.
机构地区 Ophthalmic Center
出处 《International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition)》 SCIE CAS 2016年第7期1006-1010,共5页 国际眼科杂志(英文版)
关键词 Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography laser in situ keratomileusis flap femtosecond laser Wavelight FS200 Intralase FS60 Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography laser in situ keratomileusis flap femtosecond laser Wavelight FS200 Intralase FS60
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Sandoval HP, de Castro LE, Vroman DT, Solomon KD. Refractive surgery su rv ey 2004. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005 ;31 ( 1 ):221 - 233.
  • 2Sugar A, Rapuano C J, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley CA, Agapitos PJ, de Luise VP, Koch DD. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.Ophthalmology, 2002; 109(1 ):175-187.
  • 3Zhou Y, Tian L, Wang N, Dougherty PJ. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurement of LASIK Flaps: femtosecond laser vs microkeratome. J Rrfiact Surg, 2011;27(6):408-416.
  • 4Reggiani-Mello G, Krueger RR. Comparison of commercially available femtosecond lasers in refractive surgery. Expert Rev Ophthalmol2011 ;6(1 ): 55-65.
  • 5Binder PS, Trattler WB. Evaluation of a risk factor scoring system for corneal ectasia after LASIK in eyes with normal topography, J Refract Surg, 2010;26(4):241-250.
  • 6Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gohhe M. Comparison of residual stromal bed thickness measurement among very high-frequency digital ultrasound, intraoperative handheld ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography. J Rcfracl Surg 2012; 28 ( 1 ):42-47.
  • 7Dawson DG, Randleman JB, Grossniklaus HE, O'Brien TP, Dubovy SR, Schmack I, Stulting RD, Edeihauser HF. Corneal ectasia after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: histopathology, uhrastructure, and pathophysiology.Ophthalmology 2008; 115(12):2181- 2 l 91 .e 1.
  • 80u RJ, Shaw EL,Glasgow BJ. Kerateetasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): evaluation of the calculated residual stromal bed thickness. Am J Ophthalmol2002;134(5):771-773.
  • 9Patel SV, Maguire LJ, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical ruicrokeratome for LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(8): 1482-1490.
  • 10Lim T, Yang S, Kim M, Tchah H. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol2006;l 41 (5):833-839.

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部