《春秋》与《左传》契合度的数据分析

Data- based Fitness Analysis to The Spring and Autumn Annals and The Commentary of Zuo

春秋三传中,《左传》是唯一以史证经的传,但学界对二者关系的质疑也不绝于耳。本文对《春秋》、《左传》各条目进行逐一比对,统计出经数、传数、无传的经数、无经的传数,进行经传契合度的整体和分期数据分析,揭示了经传契合的基本特点,为进一步研究经传关系提供了线索。

Among the Three Commentaries of The Spring and Autumn Annals,The Commentary of Zuo is the only one to verifyConfucian classics with historical records,whose relationship is yet constantly put to question in academia. Based on a one- to-one comparison of the respective catalogues,this paper collects data in terms of Confucian classics,historical records,Confucian classics without historical records,historical records without Confucian classics. Data analysis in terms of their whole and partial fitness indicates the basic features of classics- record fitness,which provides further clues for future study.