摘要
在我国民法典的制定中,将"国家政策"规定为民法的正式法源不具有正当性,但"国家政策"仍是立法和法律适用中可予(或应予)考量的一项政治因素。凡是能够通过"最大公益性"要求检验的国家政策,其本身具有公共政策属性,可融入立法而制定法化。在法律适用中"国家政策"可经由司法的"创制政策"、"发现政策"、"释明政策"路径进入裁判。未来民法典不应再明定"国家政策"的法源地位,应将其涵摄于民法典的公序良俗(或者公共政策)条款。
Although ＂state policy＂ as the formal sources of civil law has no legitimacy in its constitution, it is still a political factor to consider in the course of legislation and law application. Some ＂state poli- cies＂ may be regarded as legal sources when they are tested qualified through the ＂utmost public inter- est＂ inspection. Such state policies are public policies as their own that can be integrated into law. In the application of law, state policies can be applied through the judicial paths of ＂policy-making＂, ＂policy- discovery＂ and ＂policy-vindication＂. The future civil code should not provide ＂state policy＂ as legal sources, but be integrated into the clause of public order and good custom or public policy instead.
出处
《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期25-36,共12页
Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金青年项目"公私法交融视域下的违法建筑问题研究"(13CFX067)
关键词
民法典
法律渊源
国家政策
公共政策
公序良俗
最大公益
政策解释
civil code
sources of law
state policy
public policy
public order and good custom
ut- most public interest
policy interpretation
