摘要
遵义会议是否改变了中国共产党的政治路线,这是认识和评价遵义会议历史作用的一个重要问题。普遍的表述是,遵义会议解决了党内所面临的最迫切的组织问题和军事问题,而没有提出和解决政治路线问题。但是,基于政治路线和军事路线、组织路线的关系分析,如果政治路线没有改变,军事路线和组织路线改变的作用就会大打折扣;从历史作用看,如果遵义会议没有改变政治路线,就很难说"结束了‘左’倾教条主义错误在中央的统治",就很难产生"生死攸关的转折点"的巨大作用。仔细研究遵义会议以后的历史,其基本的事实是,遵义会议在改变军事路线、组织路线的同时,实际上改变了政治路线。遵义会议虽然"没有提出和解决政治路线问题",但没有明确提出并不等于事实上没有改变政治路线。
The argument about whether the Zunyi Meeting changed the Party's political line was an essential issue of evaluating the meeting's historic significance. One popular statement held that the Zunyi Meeting bad corrected the Party's military and organizational principles but failed to provide corresponding solutions for the Party's political line. Based on the analysis of integrated relations among the Party's political, military and organizational principles, the later could not play an adequate role in party- building unless the political line had been adjusted accordingly. If the Zunyi Meeting did not make any effect on the political line, we should hardly say that the Zunyi Meeting was "the turning point of the Party" by correcting serious errors of a "Left" dogmatism character. Nevertheless, with an intensive study on the history of the Zunyi Meeting, the paper argues that Zunyi Meeting did make a great impact on the Party's political line, not only the contribution to the military and organizational line. Despite that the Meeting did not explicitly offer a political line for the Party to follow, it did not mean that the political line had not been changed in practical.
出处
《中国浦东干部学院学报》
2016年第4期86-92,共7页
Journal of China Executive Leadership Academy Pudong
关键词
遵义会议
政治路线
军事路线
组织路线
the Zunyi Meeting
political line
military line
organizational line