两种方法诊断女性需氧菌阴道炎的对比分析

Comparative analysis of two methods in diagnosing aerobic vaginitis

目的对比分析两种方法诊断女性需氧菌阴道炎的效果。方法使用Donders湿片高倍镜检法、Tempera临床和微生物诊断法对2014年5月至2015年4月妇科门诊8 326例就诊患者需氧菌感染情况进行对比分析。结果在8 326例就诊患者中,采用Donders湿片高倍镜检法检出需氧菌阴道炎患者1 819例,检出率为21.8%;采用Tempera临床和微生物诊断法检出需氧菌阴道炎患者1 825例,检出率为21.9%。通过SPSS13.0统计学分析,两种方法在需氧菌阴道炎检出率方面不存在显著差异(χ2=20.4,P>0.05)。结论这两种方法诊断需氧菌阴道炎具有很好的一致性,医院可根据自身实际情况选择其中一种。南宁地区女性需氧菌阴道炎检出率仅次于细菌性阴道病,针对需氧菌阴道炎应采取科学有效的治疗方案,提升需氧菌阴道炎治疗效率。

Objective To comparatively analyze two methods of diagnosing aerobic vaginitis.Methods 8 326 female outpatients of the gynecology clinic during May 2014 and 2015April were analyzed comparatively by using Donders microscopic examination and Tempera clinical and microbiological diagnosis methods.Results Of the 8326 outpatients,1 819（21.8%）were diagnosed as aerobic vaginitis by using Donders microscopic examination,while 1 825（21.9%）were diagnosed by using Tempera clinical and microbiological diagnosis method.SPSS13.0statistical analysis showed no significant difference（χ2=20.4,P〉0.05）in the detection rate of aerobic vaginitis between the two methods.Conclusion The two methods have good consistency in diagnosing aerobic vaginitis,so hospitals can choose either method according to their own actual situation.