期刊文献+

调节定向对创新网络惯例的影响--基于组织间信任的情景分析 被引量:15

Impacts of regulatory focus on innovation network routines——A situational analysis based on inter-organizational trust
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文主要研究创新网络中企业的调节定向对网络惯例所产生的影响,并揭示了在不同组织间信任情景下该影响效应的差异。在文献梳理的基础上,从认知和情感两个维度来剖析组织间信任,并依据程度的差异区分为四个组织情境,分别对调节定向与网络惯例的关系展开研究。实证结果显示:信任的情境不同,调节定向与网络惯例之间的关系也会随之发生变化;在情景1中,也就是信任两个维度的程度都较高时,调节定向对网络惯例的正向影响最为显著;在认知信任较高但情感信任较低的情景2中,预防定向不利于网络惯例的形成;在认知和情感两种信任程度都较低的情景中,预防定向与网络惯例不存在显著的相关关系。本文的研究是对调节定向理论和组织惯例研究的有益扩展,有助于指导企业的网络化合作创新行为。 As basic elements of network behavior, network routines can be considered as the core elements to maintain and coordinate innovation network operation. On the basis of related literature, inter - organizational trust can be classified into cognitive -based trust and emotional -based trust, and divided into four different contexts. We construct the theoretical hypotheses between regulatory focus and network routines. We use the actual data of the process of innovation cooperation in China, and conduct an empirical test with the help of SPSS17.0. The whole research shows that regulatory focus has different influences on network routines in different contexts. In the contexts of high cognitive - based trust and emotional - based trust, the regulatory focus has a positive impact on the degree of network routines.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期1-7,共7页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金:创新网络中企业惯例搜寻的形成与作用机理研究(71502090) 起止时间:2016.01-2018.12 国家自然科学基金:技术创新网络惯例形成及在治理中的作用机理研究(71372171) 项目起止时间:2014.01-2017.12 中国博士后科学基金面上项目:创新网络惯例对企业合作绩效的作用机理研究(2015M581124) 项目起止时间:2015.01-2016.06
关键词 调节定向 网络惯例 组织间信任 创新网络 regulatory focus network routines inter - organizational trust innovation network
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献275

  • 1芮鸿程.网络组织的形成与运作机理研究[J].学术界,2001(3):202-208. 被引量:17
  • 2陈学光,徐金发.网络组织及其惯例的形成——基于演化论的视角[J].中国工业经济,2006(4):52-58. 被引量:41
  • 3Sengupta, J., & Zhou, R. (2007). Understanding impulsive eaters' choice behaviors: the motivational influences of regulatory focus. Journal of Marketing Research,44,297-308.
  • 4Shah, J. Y., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Promoting us or preventing them: Regulatory focus and manifestations of intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 433-446.
  • 5Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy X value effects: Regulatory focus as a determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447-458.
  • 6Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 693-705.
  • 7Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A., Y. (2001). "I" seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33-49.
  • 8Amodio, D. M., Shah, J. Y., Sigelman, J., Brazy, P. C., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 225-232.
  • 9Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey, G., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity: the role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 435-448.
  • 10Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory focus Theory: implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 86, 35-66.

共引文献332

同被引文献156

引证文献15

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部