社会与情绪健康量表在中国中学生中的验证被引量：5

Preliminary Validation of the Social and Emotional Health Survey in Chinese Secondary School Students

导出

摘要目的:引进国外最新的积极心理品质(共同生命力)的理论模型和测量工具(社会与情绪健康量表,SEHS),初步检验其在中国中学生群体中的适宜性。方法:在四川省和河北省选取四所中学17个班级共726名中学生,采用计算机课上老师监督学生完成网上问卷调查(包括SEHS和主观幸福感量表),并收集学生的学业成绩。结果:社会与情绪健康量表的项目质量较好;验证性因素分析结果表明数据较好地拟合了共同生命力的二阶模型;共同生命力显著预测中学生主观幸福感和学业成绩;总量表的内部一致性α系数为0.923,四周后重测信度系数为0.803。结论:SEHS具有较好的信效度,可以作为测量中国中学生积极心理品质—社会与情绪健康的适宜工具。 Objective： We introduced the theoretical model（Covitality） and measuring tool（Social and Emotional Health Survey, SEHS） of positive psychological quality. Methods： We selected 726 students in 17 classes from four secondary schools in Sichuan and Hebei in China. All students completed the online questionnaire（including SEHS and subject well-being scale） in computer classes, and their academic performances were collected. Results： The items＇ qualities of SEHS were good; result of CFA indicated that data fitted the second-order model of covitality; the covitality significantly predicted the students＇ subjective well-being and academic performance; Cronbach＇ s alpha coefficient of SEHS was 0.923, and test-retest reliability was 0.803. Conclusion： The Chinese version of SEHS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing positive psychological quality of Chinese secondary school students.

作者潘彦谷张大均陈万芬刘广增

机构地区西南大学心理健康教育研究中心&心理学部

出处《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期680-683,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基金中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心"2011计划"项目:中小学生心理健康测评工具与发展诊断研究(2014-06-007-01)的资助

关键词共同生命力社会与情绪健康量表主观幸福感学业成绩 Covitality Social and Emotional Health Survey Subjective Well-being Academic performance

分类号 R395.1 [医药卫生—医学心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1Keyes CL. Promoting and protecting mental health as flour- ishing: a complementary strategy for improving national me- ntal health. American Psychologist, 2007, 62(2): 95-108.
2Suldo SM, Shaffer EJ. Looking beyond psychopathology: The dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychol- ogy Review, 2008, 37(1): 52-68.
3王鑫强,张大均.心理健康双因素模型述评及其研究展望[J].中国特殊教育,2011(10):68-73. 被引量：101
4Seligman ME, Ernst RM, Gillham J, et al. Positive educa- tion: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Ox- ford Review of Education, 2009, 35(3): 293-311.
5Furlong M J, Gilman R, Huebner ES. Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools(Second Edition). Routledge, 2014.
6Furlong MJ, You S, Renshaw TL, et al. Preliminary develop- ment and validation of the Social and Emotional Health Sur- vey for secondary school students. Social Indicators Re- search, 2014, 117(3): 1011-1032.
7Ito A, Smith DC, You S, et al. Validation and utility of the social emotional health survey-secondary for Japanese stu- dents. Contemporary School Psychology, 2015, 19(4): 243- 252.
8Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen R J, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49 (1): 71-75.
9Muthan LK, Muth6n BO. Mplus User's Guide(Seventh Edi- tion). Los Angeles, CA: Muthan & Muth6n, 1998-2012.
10Pennell C, Boman P, Mergler A. Covitality constructs as pre- dictors of psychological well-being and depression for sec- ondary school students. Contemporary School Psychology, 2015, 19(4): 276-285.